Home Sitemap Public Interest Dental Care Providers Denturist Services Consumer Perspective FAQ Professional Interest Consumer Testimonials Useful Links

Dental Care Providers and Denture services:

Oral Health Human Resources
          Dentists
            Oral hygienists
             Dental therapists

            Dental assistants
            Dental Technicians
            Unqualified Quacks
            Denturists
Differentiating denture providers
International Practice

Australia    Belgium    Canada    Cyprus    Denmark    Estonia    Finland    France    Germany    Greece    Hungary    Ireland (Eire)    Italy    Kenya    Malta    Mauritius   Netherlands    New Zealand    Norway    Poland    Portugal    Romania    Slovakia    South Africa    Spain    St Kitts (St Christopher ) and Nevis    Switzerland   United Kingdom of Great Britain    United States of America
Solidarity for Denturism (Photographs)
Expanded services - Removing Market Restrictions!

            Professionals Complementary to Dentistry 
            Payment for Clinical services of PCDs 
            Predicament of dental technicians
            Restrictions on the sale of dentures and clinical training
            Established Denturism

In this chapter the focus is on Oral Health Human Resources and the services they provide. The SCDT is of the conviction that a patient must have the freedom to choose and have access to the care provider of his/her choice. We also recognize that patients need protection against unprofessional and incompetent provision of health services, especially when it results in a potential treat to the patient’s health or a self-serving monopolistic service. Health legislation therefore reserved certain procedures for only those that are regarded as competent to carry out such work. Can all the restrictions and the results of those restrictions be justified in terms of public needs? Are all the reservations still relevant in terms of global trends and practices and the modern training of Oral Health Human Resources (OHHR)? We conclude with a resounding: NO!

There should be an awareness of the knowledge and training, but also limited grounding, that each category of OHHR has in specific disciplines. Where appropriate, recognition and opportunities should be given to alternative categories that can expand their training and scope of practice to serve the oral care needs of individuals and communities in a more efficient manner! The necessity of keeping distinctions between professional categories have created restriction-walls that disrupt professional mobility - we must ensure an appropriate framework for progressive academic and professional development for those that want to specialize and progress to another category. When appropriate, existing restrictions that are counter-productive to service-efficiency, needs to be relaxed (or decriminalized )!

 

Oral Health Human Resources (OHHR):

All Oral Health personnel that comes into contact with patients is regulated by the Health Profession's Council of South Africa (HPCSA) The Register (June 2006) shows [1]:

There are a total of 409 Specialists [2] (the amount of Specialists in brackets ), including:   

The South African Dental Technicians Council (SADTC) regulates the training and practice of dental technicians. The Register [3] (April 2006) shows:

As with dentists, many dental technicians are working overseas (some have qualified as denturists). It is estimated that there are about 1000 dental technicians actively working in South Africa. From 2008 dental laboratory assistants will also have to be registered. According to the recently formed Dental Laboratory Assistants Association of South Africa (DENTLAASA) there are about 3000 people working in this category that could qualify for restricted registration in terms of the Dental Technicians Amendment Act, 2004[4]


[1] REGISTER OF ORAL HEALTH HUMAN RESOURCES Mrs. Y Daffue, IT Helpdesk & Statistics HPCSA, 5 June 2006
[2]
REGISTER OF DENTAL SPECIALISTS Mrs. Y Daffue, IT Helpdesk & Statistics HPCSA, 5 June 2006
[3] Register of Dental Technicians.( Anita - Register Controller) SADTC. April 2006 
[4] Section 1 and 2 of Act No 24 of 2004, the Dental Technicians Amendment Act, 2004

Dentists:

The primary function of dentists is to perform the full range of services related to their patient’s oral health care and well being, conserve natural teeth, and prevent, diagnose and treat diseases of the teeth, gums and the mouth. A secondary function of dentists is the restoration of natural teeth due to attrition, oral disease and mutilation by means of filling of cavities, preparing and cementing crowns, and ultimately the extraction of non-vital teeth and roots, treatment of abscesses and gum infection, as well as a whole range of oral surgical procedures [1]. That is in essence what dentists are trained for, although the procedures they may perform makes out a very impressive list of varying disciplines. In private practice, the dentist is also responsible for practice- and patient care management and the delegation of staff responsibilities. Due to the wide range of services dentists provide and the cost of specialized training and equipment, a high hourly-rate has to be charged to cover the expense as an availability fee [2], whether the whole range of those services are needed by a specific patient, or whether it can be utilized or not.  (See also  Effect of Competition on the Cost of Dentures)

Since the development of dentistry in the nineteenth century, the productivity of the dental surgeon was stifled, as he was responsible for both the clinical and technical procedures of denture construction and delivery, as well as the clinical, surgical and educational responsibilities of controlling oral disease. The result was the introduction of auxiliaries to enable the dental surgeon to be more efficient in patient care. The first of these was the dental technician, who took over the responsibility of manufacturing all the custom-made dental appliances for the dentist's patient on a contract basis. Following this dramatic increase in productivity due to the efficiency of dental technicians, the categories of dental assistant and oral hygienist were to follow[3].

Dentists employ Dental Assistants and Oral Hygienists to increase their productivity. Dental Therapists also alleviates the demand for professional Oral Health services, especially in the rural areas. Dentists may further specialize themselves in a variety of specialties of their choice. 

For many decades there has been a fashionable trend amongst newly qualified dentists from South Africa to go and work overseas to gain experience. Many never returns, resulting in a loss to the country, in terms of money spent in subsidized training, funded by the taxpayer. In the UK alone, there were 1753 South African dentists working in October 2002. Large numbers of SA trained dentists are also registered in Canada, Australia and New Zealand [4]. The proposals of the National Human Resources for Health Plan of the Department of Health are to decrease the production of Dentists from 200 to 120 annually by 2008 [5].

In view of the vast range of specialized procedures and techniques that dentists have to master, it is simply inhuman to become experts in al these fields in the given shortened training period. Removable prosthetics is one of the areas that many dentists feel inadequately equipped, and often needs the specialized advice and direction from dental technicians to facilitate a more-or-less functional denture for their patient. The "Fundamentals of Occlusion " can only be mastered through the process of getting a lot of experience in setting up Full upper & Full lower (F/F) dentures. Dentists only do one or two set-ups as students and do not have this experience as they are only given limited exposure to the principles of denture technology. Dentists contract out the work of producing dentures to dental technicians working in commercial dental laboratories, as they are not sufficiently trained themselves for commercial denture production.  Dentists seldom (if ever ) make dentures; they have a monopoly on selling [6] dentures, only! [7]. During the customary process of denture-provision dentists function as a go-between. Dentists perform the measurement and assessment procedures during the clinical stages and by law have to take responsibility for all the clinical and technical aspects of the finished denture after delivery [8]The proposal from the Society for CDT is the introduction of a Denturist category to provide another choice of options to denture wearers. 

In many countries where denturism was established, dentists refer denture wearers to this specialized member of the Oral Health Team, for example Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Netherlands, Switzerland, etc. In some countries it is becoming normal to see Dentists, Denturists, Hygienists, Therapists and other OHHR in group practices to serve all the various dental needs of their communities. Cooperation and referrals between dentists and denturists is becoming routine. Those who refers their patients to the other profession also benefits by receiving more patients on referral from them[9]. It is becoming common practice for Dentists to sub-contract their denture cases with complications, "difficult  " patients and psychosomatic patients to the "Specialized Denture Service  " of Denturists[10]. It is reported from Australia that the provision of dentures by Denturists is so effective, that Dental Schools are now considering discontinuing denture training for dentistry students.


[1] CLINICAL DENTAL TECHNOLOGY: A QUEST FOR EQUITY IN ORAL HEALTH CARE by The Society for Clinical Dental Technology, 1998. Motivational Report to the SADTC, Minister of Health and the Department of Health. Authors: Malherbe DF, Steyn LA, Du Plessis C, Fatagodien Z
[2] ] Letter from Dr H Heydt, Executive Director of the DASA to Mr. EAJ Buret. Sept 1989
[3]
Prof J.Bates. Report on Denturism British Dental Journal - March 1985
[4]
Rense.com – Dentists leave SA in droves  www.news24.com/News/South_Africa/News/0,6119,2-7-1442_1481177,00.html
[5]
A NATIONAL HUMAN RESOURCES PLAN FOR HEALTH Department of Health. Table 11: Duration and Location of Training. Page 59
[6]
The Tulloch rule - Prof SAS Strauss. Unisa Dean of Faculty of Law – Some legal problems confronting the dentists. J of DASA September 1979
[7]
Correspondence of The Society to the Directorate of Oral Health, Department of Health  RE- MINUTES OF THE ORAL HEALTH HUMAN RESOURCES TASK TEAM MEETING on 6 Feb 2004
[8]
Memorandum by The Society for Clinical Dental Technology to the Human Resources Cluster of the National Department of Health as a GENERAL MOTIVATION FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CATEGORY OF CLINICAL DENTAL TECHNOLOGIST IN ORAL HEALTH CARE. – In response to the Draft Strategic Framework for Human Resources for Health Plan. August 2005
[9]
Tuominen R. Cooperation and competition between dentists and denturists in Finland.  Department of Public Health, University  of Helsinki, Finland. Risto.Tuominen@Helsinki.Fi, March 2002 [10] Correspondence from Ismael Larney, Senior Lecturer in Dental Prosthetist training at Randwick College of TAFE, Sydney during 2005 and 2006

 

Oral Hygienists:

An Oral Hygienist is an Oral Health Professional who specializes in cleaning teeth and gum treatments under the direction of a dentist, and provides guidance on oral health programs. Oral Hygienists remove soft and hard deposits from teeth, teach patients how to practice good oral hygiene, and provide other preventive dental care. Hygienists examine patients’ teeth and gums, recording the presence of diseases or abnormalities. They apply cavity-preventive agents such as fluorides and pit and fissure sealants; remove calculus, stains, and plaque from teeth; perform root planing as a periodontal therapy; and also take and develop dental X-rays. 

In some countries, as in South Africa, Oral hygienists with extended duties perform additional services, such as: administer anaesthetics, place and carve filling materials, temporary fillings, and periodontal dressings; remove sutures; smooth and polish metal restorations and cement crowns. This category of Oral hygienists may not diagnose diseases, but they can prepare clinical and laboratory diagnostic tests for the dentist to interpret.

Oral Hygienists also help patients develop and maintain good oral health. For example, they inform patients how to select toothbrushes and show them how to brush and floss their teeth, or may explain the relationship between diet and oral health. Oral Hygienists use hand and rotary instruments and ultrasonics to clean and polish teeth, X-ray machines to take dental X-rays, syringes with needles to administer local anaesthetics, and plaster models of teeth to demonstrate oral hygiene procedures.

Flexible scheduling is a distinctive feature of this job. Full-time, part-time, evening, and weekend schedules are widely available. Dentists frequently hire hygienists to work only 2 or 3 days a week, so hygienists may hold jobs in more than one dental practice. Population growth and greater retention of natural teeth will stimulate demand for oral hygienists. Older dentists, who have been less likely to employ oral hygienists, are leaving the occupation and will be replaced by recent graduates, who are more likely to employ one or even two hygienists. In addition, as dentists’ workloads increase, they are expected to hire more hygienists to perform preventive dental care, such as cleaning, so that they may devote their own time to more profitable specialized procedures.

There are currently 696 Oral Hygienists and 271 with expanded function (total 967) registered with the HPCSA[1]. The proposals of the National Human Resources for Health Plan of the Department of Health are to increase the production of Oral Hygienists from 70 to 150 annually by 2009[2].

There is a school of thought entertained in some countries that propagates the deployment of Oral Hygienists in their own private clinics with patients attending on appointment or by referral from a Dentist, Dental therapist or Denturist. In South Africa Oral Hygienists may indeed benefit from expanding their services as independent service providers and the public oral health (hygiene) may benefit from such an arrangement as a result of the service being more accessible and subject to market forces.

Text overseen by Zuleika Nortje Senior Lecturer in Oral Hygiene and Dental Assisting at the Department of Dental Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology
[1]
REGISTER OF ORAL HYGIENISTS Mrs. Y Daffue, IT Helpdesk & Statistics HPCSA, 5 June 2006
[2]
A NATIONAL HUMAN RESOURCES PLAN FOR HEALTH Department of Health. Table 11: Duration and Location of Training. Page 59

 

Dental Therapists

Outside the United States, more than 50 countries, including some western European nations, now allow dental therapists to drill and fill cavities, usually in children. Proponents of dental therapy say their training is comparable to the practical training that dentists receive, but without the general medical training dentists get. Studies of the work performed by therapists have concluded that it is comparable to, and in some cases better than, that of fully trained dentists. Dr. Frank Catalanotto, a professor of community dentistry at the University of Florida, said dental therapists would be a cost-effective way to provide basic care to children and some adults who could not otherwise afford treatment.

The American Dental Association has always held the position that only licensed dentists are competent to practice dentistry and State Boards of dentistry in the USA have blocked dental therapists from working, arguing that only dentists should be allowed to drill teeth, because it is an “irreversible surgical procedure” and can lead to serious complications like infections or nerve damage. Children of Alaska Natives in remote areas have high rates of cavities and essentially no access to dentists, so a coalition of tribes began a program in 2003 to use therapists to treat native children. “There’s never been a dentist in these rural areas,” said Dr. Ron Nagel, a dentist who helped create the Alaska program. But the American Dental Association fought the program almost as soon as it began, dropping its effort only after a state judge ruled in favour of the program. Still, the group continues to oppose letting dental therapists practice anywhere in the continental United States. The dental profession’s critics — who include public health experts, some physicians and even some dental school professors — say that too many dentists are focused more on money than medicine. “Most dentists consider themselves to be in the business of dentistry rather than the practice of dentistry,” said Dr. David A. Nash, a professor of pediatric dentistry at the University of Kentucky. “I’m a cynic about my profession, but the data are there. It’s embarrassing.” The association’s president, Dr Roth said: “What we’re extremely uncomfortable with is that they need to drill teeth and sometimes extract teeth ". Use of therapists would create a two-tier system where some people have access to dentists, while others must settle for practitioners with different qualifications, she said.[1]  

Dr. Caswell A. Evans, a dentist and associate dean at the University of Illinois-Chicago, said dentists must stop fighting efforts to expand care to patients they are not currently treating. The system is failing many patients, he said. “Right now we have a double standard of care,” Dr. Evans said[2]. Some people have access to conventional providers and can still afford the service. Others have access to dentists but cannot afford the fees. They are prevented from access to alternative service providers because organized dentistry are opposed to their licensing and training.

In the UK and USA dental therapists was initially introduced to deal with children’s dental anxiety and to educate oral hygiene under supervision of a dentist[3]. The relationship between a dental therapist and a dentist is a collaborative and referral relationship where both form part of a team providing optimal oral health care. Dental therapists provide the overwhelming majority of dental care for children in Australia[4]. In South Africa the profession was introduced in 1977 as a Para dental category by historically racist pre-meditation to provide basic dental care to the rural black community[5]. Dental therapists have been given the right to independent practice of their profession in 1994. Dental therapy is a dental profession that provides routine treatment for basic and secondary dental care required by all people in South Africa, in the public and private sector. Their services include[6]:

The cost of training a dental therapist is half of that of a dentist. The cost of employing a dental therapist is half of that of a dentist and forms a strategic fit with the provision of a basic package of dental care service in the public sector. The workload in the public sector involves primarily the delivery of the basic minimum package of dental care as prescribed by the Minister of Health, which encapsulates the dental therapy profession wholly and specifically[7]. The South African Dental Association (SADA) has called for the closure of the profession of dental therapists and to end the training of this category. In the private sector Dental Therapists are facing blatant professional discrimination and anticompetitive fund allocation by Medical Schemes, and exclusion from consultation and representation in the dental programs and structures that are dominated by dentists for the professional advancement of dentists only[8].

There are currently 457 registered Dental Therapists deployed in South Africa[9]. The current proposal of the National Human Resources for Health Plan of the Department of Health is to increase the production of Dental Therapists from 25 to 600 annually by 2009. It is also proposed to change their training from 3 to 4 years and to add substantial expanded duties to their responsibility domain, including the highly controversial and seemingly irrational proposal to include prosthodontics and prosthetics in their scope of practice[10]. (Unilateral untransparent decision-making seems to have followed dental therapy since inception ) This aspect of the OHHR Development has been included in isolation from Dental Technology, and an open debate with all the stakeholders is required to consider all the implications of this proposal to all the stakeholders that will be implicated. The Society for Clinical Dental Technology has been asking for such a debate for the last decade. 


[1]  Alex Berenson - Boom times for Dentists, but not for Teeth. The New York Times October 11, 2007 nytimes.com
[2] 
Alex Berenson - Boom times for Dentists, but not for Teeth. The New York Times October 11, 2007 nytimes.com
[3]
The Nuffield Foundation - EDUCATION AND TRAINING OF PERSONNEL AUXILIARY TO DENTISTRY, 1993 London UK
[4]
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DENTAL THERAPY PROFESSION Satur J. Deakin University, Australia

[5]
CLINICAL DENTAL TECHNOLOGY: A QUEST FOR EQUITY IN ORAL HEALTH CARE by The Society for Clinical Dental Technology, 1998. Motivational Report to the SADTC, Minister of Health and the Department of Health. Authors: Malherbe DF, Steyn LA, Du Plessis C, Fatagodien Z.
[6]
GROSS INJUSTICE AND PROFESSIONAL DISCRIMINATION –The Dental Therapy Association. Naidoo LS www.dentasa.zoomshare.com/News/2.shtml
[7]
DENTAL THERAPY DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTH AFRICA – LATEST DEVELOPMENTS 25 July 2006. www.dentasa.zoomshare.com/News/2.shtml
[8]
DENIS THE MENACE 09 Aug 2006 Naidoo LS. www.dentasa.zoomshare.com/News/2.shtml
[9]
REGISTER OF DENTAL THERAPISTS Mrs. Y Daffue, IT Helpdesk & Statistics HPCSA, 5 June 2006
[
10] A NATIONAL HUMAN RESOURCES PLAN FOR HEALTH Department of Health. Table 11: Duration and Location of Training. Page 59

 

Dental Assistants:

Dental Assistants assist Dentists during the examination and treatment of patients. Dental Assistants work primarily in dentists' surgeries/consultation rooms. They perform some or all of the following duties:

The use of Dental Assistants to facilitate some functions of the dentist has increased the productivity of dentists by way of fourhanded dentistry, and makes it possible for a dentist to serve two patients in adjoining rooms simultaneously. They may be asked to assist the oral hygienist as well. 

Dental assistants are expected in some dental practices to also perform the clinical measurement procedures during denture provision, which is reserved exclusively for dentists. Dental assistants are obviously not trained or competent for this task and creates the perception that the dentist is incompetent for clinical prosthetic procedures. This suspicious practice often leads to friction with dental laboratories having to do numerous retries and remakes at the unwarranted expense of the dental laboratory.

There are many thousands of practicing Dental Assistants that have received informal training from their employer dentists. The prescription has now changed and they have to register after receiving formal training from their choice of 4 Universities of Technology. There are currently only 56  formally trained dental assistants registered by the HPCSA. The current proposals of the National Human Resources for Health Plan of the Department of Health are to produce 300 dental assistants annually by 2008.

Text overseen by Zuleika Nortje Senior Lecturer in Oral Hygiene and Dental Assisting at the Department of Dental Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology

 

Dental Technicians:  

In contrast to Dentists that provides clinical services directly to patients from their dental surgeries, Dental Technicians work in dental laboratories and are expertly trained to make appliances on contract for dentists, having neither the formal clinical training nor the legislated mandate to do intra-oral work directly with the public. The most unfortunate result of this arrangement for dental technicians is that they can not sell their labor in an open unrestricted market and that they can very seldom see the end result of their efforts in the patient's mouth. The appreciation on the patient's face and the change of self-esteem evident in his/her eyes after successful placement of a crown or a denture, is reserved exclusively for the go-between dentist, who often does not fully appreciate/understand the effort and time that goes into a hand-made restoration, and denied from the dental technician that manufactured the appliances in isolation from the consumer.

The Dental Technician working independently as a sub-contractor produces all artificial appliances as well as designing and making of prostheses for dentist’s patient needs, without the advantage of firsthand interaction with the consumer. Different materials and techniques are used to make specific handmade restorations for individual patients. Dentists often collaborate with dental technicians for advice on resolving complicated cases or about alternative materials or appliance-designs to meet their patients’ expectations. 

As a practical arrangement, many dentists' patients are referred (illegally ) directly to dental technicians for repairs and other denture procedures, which dentists cannot relay or do themselves as a go-between. Many denture wearers prefer to deal directly with the manufacturer to prevent misunderstandings and can not understand why dental technicians may not make their dentures without the dentist "interfering " as a go-between. The proposal to implement Denturism (as another oral health category ) is not to take work away from the dentist, but to allow a patient to make a free choice between a denturist or dentist, and for a trained Clinical Dental Technologist to be in a legal profession to supply patients directly with accurate, aesthetic, and functional dentures, that provide patient satisfaction and optimal success. There is a committed strive of denture technicians, to help denture patients to receive the best product possible in a legalized professional way.

Until 1923 it was common practice for many Dental Technicians (then called dental mechanicians/dental mechanics  ) to make and provide appliances directly to their denture wearing patients. After the passing of the first dental legislation, many dental technicians serving the public directly were allowed to register as dentists, the others were still allowed do do repairs directly for denture wearers. Since 1945 Dental Technicians have been regulated under a law of Parliament by the initiative of the Dental Association that effectively barred them from legally doing any intra-oral work. Over the years technological developments in the field of dentistry led to new procedures and techniques. The most significant development in the history of the profession in South Africa was the introduction of Technikon training in 1972. In 1979 the Dental Technicians Act was redrafted to accommodate the modern practice and training of dental technicians. Even in the EU and the US dental technicians does not have the curriculum or the recognition for specialized training that South African Dental Technicians have. A unique statutory body that functions independently from other health regulatory structures regulates the profession. South African Dental Technicians have been in high demand internationally for their quality of training and work ethic.  After 3 years a National Diploma may be issued that allows the holder to be registered for employment as a dental technician employee. Dental Technicians with 3 years training may proceed for a forth year to be issued with a B.Tech degree from any of three Universities of Technology (formerly called Technikons ) and can now progress to a Masters degree.

In 1994 democracy for all dawned on South Africa after a spiritually uplifting election that made the word hold it's breath and the acceptance of what is widely regarded as the most enlightened Constitution in modern politics. Shortly thereafter, in 1997, the Dental Technicians Act was amended and even made provision for a definition of Denturism under the title of Clinical Dental Technology (CDT).

During their 4 year- training (B.Tech degree ), dental technicians become proficient in different specialized disciplines: 

In South Africa the South African Dental Technicians Council (SADTC) regulates the training and practice of dental technicians. The Register (April 2006) shows:

Dental Technicians                                     1290
Dental Technician Contractors                    681
Registered Laboratories                               683

Type of Laboratory:

General Dental Laboratory >1 discipline    393
Prosthetics                                                          57
Crown & Bridge                                                139
Chrome Cobalt                                                      8
Orthodontics                                                        23

Dental Technologists and Dental Technicians work in dental laboratories and have Dental Laboratory Assistants (internationally called process workers)  to help facilitate the production of dental appliances for dentists' patients. Current Legislation Amendment proposals will provide the framework through which Dental Laboratory Assistants with many years of experience will be afforded the opportunity to get recognition for their skills, knowledge and expertise by Recognition of Prior Learning procedure and the opportunity to do a proficiency test for restricted registration as dental technician.

The current proposals of the National Human Resources for Health Plan of the Department of Health mistakenly  only acknowledges a 2-year qualification and proposes that the current numbers of training of dental technicians be maintained. The Department of Health have recently declined all efforts from Dental Technology to participate in discussions about professional development with regards to Clinical Dental Technology and to make input to the National Human Resources for Health Plan despite a number of appointments, that have all been postponed, to make a presentation by The Society for CDT (about the introduction of a category of Denturist or the amendment and implementation of the enabling provision for a category of CDT ). 

 

Unqualified Quacks:

"Quackery " derives from the word quacksalver (someone who boasts about his salves). Dictionaries define quack as "a pretender to medical skill; a charlatan " and "one who talks pretentiously without sound knowledge of the subject discussed ." These definitions suggest that the promotion of quackery involves deliberate deception, but many promoters sincerely believe in what they are doing. Health fraud is defined as "the promotion, for profit, of a medical remedy known to be false or unproven ." This also can cause confusion because in ordinary usage and the word "fraud " connotes deliberate deception. Quackery's paramount characteristic is promotion ("Quacks quack! ") rather than fraud, greed, or misinformation. [1]

Illicit supply of dentures has been around since the selling of dentures was monopolized exclusively for dentists[2]. Unqualified denture providers without any formal training have acquired limited knowledge from working as a cleaner or a laboratory assistant in a dental practice or a dental laboratory[3]. It is claimed that some of these operators may technically be more capable in denture manufacturing techniques than some dentists are. These "Backdoor-quacks " make more dentures for disadvantaged communities than public health services of the State![4] These informal providers provide a much-needed service to the indigent population at better affordable rates. 

Sec 38(2) of Act 56 of 1974 the Medical Dental and Supplementary Health Professions Act, states: "For the purpose of this Act the Practice of Dentistry means…. the making, repairing, supplying, fitting, inserting or fixing of artificial dentures or similar dental appliances." In terms of this antiquated definition, these alternative providers are Unregistered Dentists.

This essential service is apparently expanding as more people are priced out of the market of customary providers. A large portion of denture wearers in South Africa count amongst pensioners and the poor, of whom many do not have access to Medical Schemes and already mostly falls outside the market that can afford the services of privately practicing dentists[5]. In the absence of recognition for a specialist category of Denturist, the indigent denture wearing public are left to the mercy of unscrupulous "quacks " where they are often subjected to[6]:

  • Cross-infection of Hepatitis B, tuberculosis and other communicable diseases (possibly even HIV/AIDS ), due to unhygienic practices;
  • The quality of dentures is often unsuitable due to limited technical knowledge resulting in design and/or manufacturing flaws;
  • The materials are normally stolen; and
  • These fly-by-night characters are unaccountable for recourse after the dentures have been delivered. 
  • As untrained operators the potential for serious consequences resulting from non-diagnosis of malignancy presenting in the mouth and the delays in crucial treatment can have devastating results.

It is a sad state of affairs that it is even necessary to indulge in stating that this is unacceptable. Clearly this type of choice is unacceptable as a health service and nobody should have to be limited to such desperation. Despite lip service to public-spirited principles, Dentists maintain an authoritarian mindset by resisting any changes to the status quo, especially attempts to a debate on Human Resource Development in this regard. Clearly these unsavory operators should be displaced by appropriately trained Denturists, who are responsible, accountable and safe.

It is reported that some dental technicians provides dentures directly to patients, in defiance of the outdated restrictions imposed by the law, in order to meet the public demand and to overcome the flaws and clumsy procedures that results from the fragmentation of the legally prescribed denture-delivery procedures of working through a go-between. The illegal supply by dental technicians is not because of an inherently criminal nature - far from it! It is out of compassion for the denture wearer’s plight and often at no charge or only charging for making the denture at normal laboratory fees [7]. Organized Dentistry has consistently opposed the establishment of clinical training for Dental Technicians to upgrade to Denturists, but have suggested that the irresponsible "Backdoor-quack " providers could be legitimised[8] or that dental therapists could be trained to make and provide dentures[9]This authoritarian mindset (spiteful?) prevents the empowerment of "dentally disabled  " people to exercise their freedom of choice to make informed decisions and prevents their access to affordable rehabilitation that is also safe and dependable.


[1] Stephen Barrett, M.D. Quackery: How Should It Be Defined? <http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiry/ncp/subs/subdr181(pages72-129).pdf - page7>
[2] OFFICE OF FAIR TRADING REPORT into private Dentistry in the UK 2003
[3]
CLINICAL DENTAL TECHNOLOGY: A QUEST FOR EQUITY IN ORAL HEALTH CARE by The Society for Clinical Dental Technology, 1998. Motivational Report to the SADTC, Minister of Health and the Department of Health. Authors: Malherbe DF, Steyn LA, Du Plessis C, Fatagodien Z.  
[4]
Memorandum by The Society for Clinical Dental Technology to the Human Resources Cluster of the National Department of Health as a GENERAL MOTIVATION FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CATEGORY OF CLINICAL DENTAL TECHNOLOGIST IN ORAL HEALTH CARE. – In response to the Draft Strategic Framework for Human Resources for Health Plan. August 2005  
[5]
DENTURISM – A NEW PROFESSION  (1990) A Report by the SA Federation of Dental Technicians. C du Plessis & DF Malherbe  
[6]
PROVISION OF REMOVABLE PROSTHETICS BY DENTURISTS – WHAT IS THE CONTROVERSY? International Dentistry South Africa, Duffy Malherbe. Vol 8 No 1. Jan 2006  
[7]
Consistent reporting by members and consumers to The Society  
[8]
Dr Johan Hartshorne, DENTURISM – REPORT ON A FEASIBILITY STUDY IN THE WESTERN CAPE, SADJ September 2001, Volume 56 No 9  

[9] Brig JT Barnard - Executive Director,
Presentation by the DASA to the workshop of the SADTC about the Feasibility of Denturism conducted at Pretoria Technikon in 1998  

Denturists:  

        

(See also What is Denturism on our homepage )

Denturists are Dental Technicians who have expanded their education and experience to become specialized public denture practitioners. Dentists, however, are middlemen who do not make dentures, but order them from dental laboratories, where skilled Dental Technicians construct them.

Organized Dentistry single-mindedly labeled Denturism as the illegal practice of Dentistry. Far from it! The problem lies in the antiquated definition of Dentistry that has not been updated to modern times. In the early 1900's Dentistry tried to monopolize the provision of dentures as part of their domain in many parts of the world, and jealously guarded against any competition. It used to be the most lucrative part of dentistry and "reasons " were therefore created to justify the monopoly. In some states of the USA, were denturism is not legislated yet (due to the ADA's strategic opposition ) the Canadian Denturist qualification is not recognized (considered widely as the international benchmark qualification ) and the selling of a denture by a non-dentist (regardless of denturist qualification and proven expertise exceeding that of dentists ) is declared a felony and regarded in the same category as someone deliberately misleading the public and for example doing surgery without any medical education or training. It is long overdue for dentistry to make adjustments for the international trends and local demands of the dental market in modern times.

The maintenance of natural teeth is widely accepted to be the specialized domain and responsibility reserved exclusively for dentists only. In some communities, patients who have lost all their teeth would be considered as beyond dentists’ services, with no natural teeth left to work on. There is a school of thought that the person extracting teeth should not be allowed to sell dentures, and make money from their "failures " as well. In all fairness, in defense of dentists, it must be acknowledged that patients lose their teeth for a variety of reasons, including patient abuse and oral hygiene neglect. However, the maintenance of natural teeth is the specialized domain of dentists, and it should also be acknowledged that the provision of dentures is the specialized domain of denturists. A Denturist is internationally the only professional legislated "specifically  " to make dentures directly for the patient. Denturism is the legislated practice of supplying and fitting dentures where both chair-side and laboratory work are performed by one and the same person, qualified and authorized for the purpose. Experienced dental technicians, who are already proficient in the making of dentures, are extensively upgraded and trained in the clinical procedures of denture provision and oral pathology recognition, prior to being registered as a Denturist. Such a specialist could hardly be considered an illegal dentist, but are truly professional Oral Health Care providers in their own right.

You do not need a referral from another health professional to consult with a Denturist. A Denturist can refer you to other health care professionals, if it is necessary or in the patient's health interest. Some Denturists also attend to patients denture needs in home care situations or hospital visits. Denturists are proficient and time effective in the delivery of their denture services. Most Denturists fabricate your prosthetics on the premises, ensuring quality control and care.

The scope of practice of Denturists includes clinical work, such as taking impressions, recording the bite relationship, the try-in procedure and fitting dentures, but they are to begin with the skilled manufacturers of these appliances. Denturists are denture specialists; they specialize in the manufacturing and fitting of a wide range of dentures and other removable oral prosthetic appliances directly to the public.

Denturism is an alternative to a very small part of the customary reserved work-demarcation of dentists, and contributes to the efficiency of good community and oral health care. The scope of practice for Denturists includes clinical work, but clearly draws distinction between adjustment and alteration to natural teeth or tissues of the mouth, and providing removable appliances. Denturists have an explicitly defined role in terms of design, construction, fitting, patient aftercare and care of prosthetic devices.

The preparation of rests, extraction of non-vital teeth and root-rests are regarded as issues that belong to the domain of dentists. Whenever a situation deems it appropriate, the patient is referred to a dentist, for attending to those matters first, before commencing with the measurement stage of denture production. Denturists have the expertise to recognize and refer other dental problems (including pathology ) that would require the specialized attention of a Dentist for treatment. Inter-professional referrals are standard protocol throughout the world and in many professions. The referral chain should always move upwards towards greater expertise. In the case of a rural patient presenting the need for adjustment of natural tissue (i.e. removal of a root rest ) in the absence of any dentist within reasonable proximity, a dental therapist could do the procedure as effectively. The new dispensation for dental therapists is to reduce the burden on dentists' time by the delivery of the basic procedures in dental care through dental therapists.

Although interim legislation provision has been made in South Africa for clinical dental technologists, the category is not deployed yet, partly because of insufficient co-operation and strategic planning to start training. This training will be cost-effective in terms of public or private training costs of OHHR, at a fraction of the cost of training a dentist (or dental therapist) and will provide the community with an alternative, safe, highly specialized and economical service, Denturists will be better affordable to especially the often neglected categories of the poor and the aged than the conventional denture providers (±30% less ).  

 

Differentiating denture providers:

What is the essential differences in function and responsibilities of dental technicians, denturists and dentists?

Dental Technicians  work in dental laboratories and specialize in the manufacture of dental appliances, including  removable dentures, chrome cobalt frames and plates, gum-guards, oral protectors, orthodontic appliances, fixed prosthedontic appliances, crowns, bridges, veneer-facings, special trays, bleaching trays, anti-snoring appliances, etc without any interaction with the consumer by working through a go-between. They are not clinically trained for intra-oral work and do not have the legal mandate to do so, but are the experts in manufacturing all prosthetic appliances provided by dentists to their patients, including all types of dentures.

Clinical Dental Technologists are qualified dental technicians who have undertaken further training to develop clinical skills that allow them to deal directly with patients. They are entitled to sell dentures directly to members of the public. Generally called Denturists  internationally, this cadre is recognized through enabling legislation in South Africa, but (due to a dentist monopoly ) provision has neither been made for the clinical training to qualify them, nor for their registration. 

A simple way to classify the main role and focus differences between a Dentist and a Denturist is this: A Dentist  works in a dental surgery on their patients' natural teeth and provides an oral health, surgical, and restorative service, where a Denturist  works in a denture clinic on artificial teeth and provides a removable prosthetic service in co-operation with denture wearers. Denturists specialize in patient removable appliances and are fully trained to perform both intra-oral and laboratory procedures of complete, partial and other denture construction and maintenance. Dentists have exposure to the construction of dentures only as a small de-emphasized portion of their very extensive dentistry program. Both professions, working closely together, are integral to providing complete oral health care.

In the event a Denturist finds an oral medical problem during service to a "CLIENT  ", that client is referred to a Dentist, or other appropriate health professional, to become their "PATIENT  ". The narrow meaning of "PATIENT  " that relates to a person getting medical treatment for an unhealthy condition or disease does not relate to the practice of supplying a removable appliance to a person with a healthy healed up oral condition that needs rehabilitation of their masticational and speech function and aesthetical facial appearance. The availability and affordability or not of having  a functional set of dentures can have a profound impact on an edentulous persons health and quality of life. See also The Importance and Purpose of having Dentures

Denturism  is the practice of supplying and fitting dentures where both chair-side and laboratory work are performed by one and the same person, qualified and authorized for the purpose. (See also What is Denturism on our homepage ) Denturism consists of every act having as its object the assessment and diagnosis of the oral cavity, the design, construction, repair, alteration, ordering and fitting of removable oral prosthesis. Removable oral prosthetics includes:

In some countries not all these services are incorporated in the scope of practice of Denturists yet, in others tooth whitening and the servicing of implant retainers is also included in the work sphere of Denturists. Tooth whitening is a simple bleaching procedure for purely cosmetic reasons that could theoretically be provided by anybody without Oral Health training.

A denturist  is a recognized health professional who constructs, inserts and adjusts removable dentures as well as over dentures and implant retained dentures. A full denture  is one that replaces all of the patient's natural teeth. A partial denture   is one that replaces one or more teeth but not all of them. A removable implant retained denture  is an over-denture that is supported by abutments (made of titanium ), which is integrated into the bony tissue.

Trivial historic humor :

In 1981 the Alberta Dental Association submitted a private Bill to Parliament to prohibit Denturists from calling themselves as such, to prevent confusion, because there were only two letters different between the words dentist  and denturist. During the debate, a spokesperson for the Alberta Denturism Society, Adv John G Ashton, Q.C. replied: "There are only two letters different between the spelling of the words male and female, however, most of us know the difference."

   

International Practice:

Internationally the practice of Denturism is regulated by 34 independent pieces of legislation passed by different autonomous Parliaments. In different parts of the world Denturists are also referred to as:

Clinical Dental Technician
Clinical Dental Technologist
Dental Prosthetist
s
Dental Protetik
Denture Prosthetists
Denturologiste
Denturologist
Erikoishammasteknikko
Kliniske Tandteknikere
Licensed Denture Technician
Specialized Dental Technician
Tandprotheticus
Zahnprothetiker
Zubnych Protetikov  

The following overview of the oral health services in various countries were compiled from data published in: 

 

        Australia

In recent decades, Australia has transformed itself into an internationally competitive, advanced market economy. Australia has an enviable Western-style capitalist economy with a per capita GDP on par with the four dominant West European economies. Robust business and consumer confidence and high export prices for raw materials and agricultural products are fuelling the economy. Australia's emphasis on reforms, low inflation, and growing ties with China are other key factors behind the economy's strength.

The majority of dentistry in Australia is private, with a small proportion of state funded dentistry provided for pensioners. All dentists and denturists must be registered by the state or territory board. There are no recommended fee scales, as this would contravene Australian competition law. Dental records are often transferred between practitioners at the request of the patient. Each state or territory board has a complaints procedure involving the Health Departments, Dental Boards and Australian Dental Association to varying degrees.

Almost 1 000 registered Denturists (called Dental Prosthetists) are authorized to work independently of dentists as part of their private prosthetic practice and refers patients to dentists and other health professionals when appropriate. Denturists  presently receive 80% of the dentists’ scheduled fee for treatment provided. The first international Law passed specifically to regulate denturism was introduced in Tasmania in 1958 although denturists were already legitimized in the 1919 Tasmanian Dentist Act. Uniform scope of practice for full and partial dentures and mouthguards had been achieved in all states of Australia when the Western Australian government in 2006 passed the partial denture legislation. In recent years a number of Australian States/Territories, Victoria, New South Wales, ACT and Tasmania have also accepted that implant retained over-dentures are part of denturist's scope of practice, provided that a qualifying course has been undertaken. It is hoped that National Mutual Recognition Policy (Labor Movement Policy ) and Competition Policies will soon see implant retained over dentures as part of all States’ and Territories’ scope of practice.

It is becoming common practice for Dentists to sub-contract their denture cases with complications, "difficult  " patients and psychosomatic patients to the "Specialized Denture Service  " of Denturists. They may also provide mobile services in private homes and retirement situations. It is reported from Australia that the provision of dentures by Denturists is so effective, that Dental Schools are now considering discontinuing denture training for dentistry students.

All other complementary professionals have to work under the supervision of a dentist.

 

                     Belgium

The modern, private-enterprise economy of Belgium has capitalized on its central European geographic location, highly developed transport network, and diversified industrial and commercial base. Industry is concentrated mainly in the populous Flemish area in the north. With few natural resources, Belgium must import substantial quantities of raw materials and export a large volume of manufactures, making its economy unusually dependent on the state of world markets. Roughly three-quarters of its trade is with other EU countries. 

In Belgium approximately 85 % of the population is covered by national insurance for health treatment. Treatments available under national insurance and the levels of reimbursement are reviewed every other year. Private dentists deliver most of the care for both children and adults, since public dentistry services are only available in university dental school clinics. The majority of dentists in Belgium adhere to a fee scale for private treatments, which is agreed by a commission in the Office of National Health Assurances. The dentists who choose not to follow this scale set their own fees. 

There are very few dental hygienists and therapists operating in Belgium. The 1958 decree that allowed dental technicians to practice as para-medics was repealed in 1972 on insistence of the dental profession. There has been formal training for denturists since 1973, however they are still not permitted to work independently of dentists. Recently, illegal denturists have requested to be legalized, and dental technicians have called for paramedic status. Consumer bodies and the public have in the past rallied behind this cause. 

Under current EU law, the dentists' organization is not mandated because they are not doctors and are only working in a partial area of medicine. A Belgium judge have stated that the monopoly position dentists hold is no longer realistic  in Europe and legally not sustainable. The National Council of Medicine has confirmed they will support Denturists in a political process to the goal of acknowledgement of the profession.

 

        Canada

The second-largest country in the world has enough natural beauty and sights to keep you going for several lifetimes and it is said that rugged Canada will blow the dust off your heart and soul. Its wild bounty of nature parks hold bald eagles, bears, lynxes, wolves and thousand-year-old pines. Its cities are shaking off their staid reputations and reveling in their cosmopolitan chic. A land of vast distances and rich natural resources, Canada has developed economically and technologically in parallel with the US, its neighbor to the south. Canada faces the political challenges of meeting public demands for quality improvements in health care and education services, as well as responding to separatist concerns in predominantly French-speaking Quebec. Canada also aims to develop its diverse energy resources while maintaining its commitment to the environment.

The market for dentistry in Canada is almost entirely private. Dentistry is a self-regulating profession. All dentists must be registered with the Dental Regulatory Authority (DRA) for the province in which they practice. The principal remit of each DRA is to protect the public; however, they also set standards, discipline their members, administer a complaints procedure and initiate quality assurance schemes. Individual practitioners set their fee scales, which are in fact limited by the levels of compensation that public and private insurance companies will pay out. Dentists are obliged to transfer dental records at the request of the patient.  

Throughout Canada all 10 provinces and 2 territories have independently on own merits achieved legal status where denturists generally provide a full scope of practice including all removable prosthetic appliances, and  (in some states ) tooth whitening  of natural teeth. Of the ±2000 denturists registered in Canada 1750 are active members of the Denturist Association of Canada. Alberta was the first state in Northern America to legally recognize denturism in 1933 and completed the puzzle with the 2004 Prince Edward Island initiative. Denturists may be trained directly without being a dental technician first, but have to be taught for a third year to learn how to set up teeth and manufacture dentures. The former animosity between dentists and denturists have been largely replaced by mutual acceptance of all members of the Oral Team as professionals in their own right with a particular responsibility to serve the public in their own unique role. Between the 4 schools for denturism in Canada 75-100 students qualify every year. The Denturist Association of Canada (DAC) have developed an electronic claims network for denturists (DACnet) that will be ready to be launched with the two first carriers in 2007. Canada hosts the offices of the International Federation of Denturists and is proud to have input into the profession worldwide.

Hygienists are on the whole self-regulating, although they still have to work under the auspices of a dentist or to prescription and cannot charge the public directly.

 

       Cyprus

On the Mediterranean island of Cyprus, all oral Health Human Resources is foreign trained, mostly in the EU. Of the 700 registered dentists in Cyprus, all being “active ”. 43% are female. Most dentists (94%) practice in private practice. There are 250 Dental Assistants in Cyprus. Those working for the public sector are salaried. The others, in the private sector, are salaried or have an agreement with the dentist to work on commission. There are only 7 Hygienists. They are neither registered nor regulated in Cyprus, and are paid a set fee for every patient who is seen.

Dental Technicians are trained in Greece, the UK, other European countries, or the USA. The minimum requirement, for a dental technician to be registered, is 3 years study, after the completion of the secondary school studies. They normally work in separate dental laboratories and invoice the dentist for work done.

There are 70 commercial dental laboratories and 200 dental technicians, some of whom practice Denturism. Cyprus is part of the European Union since 2004, but the official position the Cypriot Dental Council has, is that Denturism is illegal. Several attempts have been made to have a meeting with the Dental Council but have failed. Being a member of the EU might facilitate an easier transition into the profession but every country reserves the right into their own affairs. The Minister of Health has been notified that, if discussions do not open with the Dental Council in the near future, a denture clinic may be opened without enabling legislation.  

 

        Denmark

Once the seat of Viking raiders and later a major north European power, Denmark has evolved into a modern, prosperous nation that is participating in the general political and economic integration of Europe. The Danish economy has in recent years undergone strong expansion, fuelled primarily by private consumption growth, but also supported by exports and investments; features a high-tech agriculture, up-to-date small-scale and corporate industry, extensive government welfare measures, comfortable living standards, and high dependence on foreign trade. Unemployment is low and Government objectives include streamlining the bureaucracy and further privatization of state assets. Danish living standards are among the highest in the world. A major long-term issue will be the sharp decline in the ratio of workers to retirees.

Dental care is free for all those under 18 years of age and is provided by dentists in public school clinics. Approximately 30 % of dentists are government salaried to work in these public clinics. Most adults receive private dental care, of which a percentage is reimbursed, depending on the age of the patient and the nature of the treatment. Some one million Danes have private health insurance to cover the cost of treatments not included under the public system. The private system is funded by social and private insurance, as well as funds from general taxation, and by direct payment. There is a general system for complaints regarding healthcare, and patients are able to request valuations of any treatment they are unsatisfied with.

Hygienists have a screening role in some of these public dental clinics and are authorized to work independently of a dentist in the private sector. If they are self-employed, they remain responsible for the patient’s well-being and can charge them directly; if this is not the case then the dentist is accountable. 

Dental laboratory technicians are not permitted to work independently. Denturists are allowed to provide all types of dentures  to the public and receive payment, as long as the patient has no pathological lesions; which must be referred to a dentist. There is specific rules that oblige dentists and denturists to cooperate when caring for patients. All Denturists and dentists must enter agreements with municipal governments, thus providing subsidized treatments for people with low income and for elderly living in nursing homes, who pay 85 % of the costs. Mentally and physically handicapped people are also covered by these agreements. According to the Vice President of the International Federation of Denturists, these are very effective. 

Denturism have been recognized legally in Denmark since 1843. Dentists have tried many times to fight the profession, without success. There are approximately 250 Denturists in Denmark. A recent needs survey indicates that there will be a requirement for additional Denturists in the future. A 1999 survey revealed that denturists were making and fitting 75-80 % of all removable dentures in the country.

 

          Estonia

After centuries of Danish, Swedish, German, and Russian rule, Estonia attained independence in 1918. Forcibly incorporated into the USSR in 1940 it regained its freedom in 1991, with the collapse of the Soviet Union. Since the last Russian troops left in 1994, Estonia has been free to promote economic and political ties with Western Europe. It joined both NATO and the EU during 2004. 

About 95% of Estonian population is a member of a Sick Fund. The remaining 5% are unemployed. For employed people, the employer pays 33% from the salary to the Fund. Estonian health insurance is solidarity insurance, so for all retired persons their health care is covered by a sick fund. About 90% of oral healthcare in Estonia is provided through general (private ) practice. Dental care services for adult patients (over 19) are paid by patients and reimbursed by the sick fund although emergency care (traumas, infections ) is paid by the sick fund. Patients who do not have insurance can only get first aid.

The (active ) dentist to population ratio was 1:418 (2003). There is no reported unemployment amongst dentists in Estonia. Access to oral healthcare may be difficult for patients who live in some urban areas, as well as all those in rural areas, as salaries there are generally too low for private care, with the low reimbursements. Indeed, there may be difficulties for patients, all over Estonia, obtaining prosthetic treatment under the scheme.

The title Dental Technicians is legally protected and there is a registered qualification which dental technicians must obtain before they can practice. They train in the country’s special technicians’ school, for a period of 3.5 years. The register is held by the Healthcare Board. Their duties are to prepare dental prosthetic and orthodontic appliances to the prescription of a dentist and they may not work independently, except for the provision of repairs to prostheses. Individual technicians are normally salaried and work in commercial laboratories which bill the dentist for work done. In 2002 it was reported that there were 232 dental technicians. Despite established direct supply of dentures, not one formal complaints about this illegal practice have been reported to the authorities. Denturists working illegally have contacted the IFD in 2006, to assist with getting recognition.  

 

         Finland

Finland is situated in northern Europe, bordering the Baltic Sea, between Sweden and Russia. In the past half century, the Finns made a remarkable transformation from a farm/forest economy to a diversified modern industrial economy; per capita income is now on par with Western Europe. Finland has a highly industrialized, largely free-market economy. Its key economic sector is manufacturing. Forestry, an important export earner, provides a secondary occupation for the rural population. High unemployment remains a persistent problem.

Oral healthcare is provided equally between the public and private sectors. Most adult dental care is provided privately and those born after 1956 receive subsidized treatment in private practices. The Finnish healthcare system is investigating means to change towards co-operation of communal and private care funding and concerned with the treatment of increasing numbers of old people in hospitals and care homes. Denturists are needed but they currently only work on private healthcare.

In Finland denturists are legally recognized and they receive specialist training. However, denturists can only work independently of a dentist in certain circumstances. They can fit full dentures  if the patient is edentulous, but partial dentures  have to be made by the order of a dentist. There are about 400 active denturists practicing in Finland. The Union of Denturists have recently suggested to the Finnish Parliament for changes to the denturist-law. They wish to make removable partials directly to the patients. Private dental services  is mainly provided by dentists and denturists. Both dentists and denturists must be registered with the Office of Healthcare Legal Protection and are obliged to take out comprehensive patient insurance. Any complaints are dealt with by either the county healthcare official or by the consumer authorities. A recent report about the professional relationship of dentists and denturists, concluded that healthy cooperation between dentists and denturists was common. Oral healthcare professionals who referred their patients to the other profession also benefited by receiving more patients on referral from them. 

Dental technicians can take money directly from the patient, although the dentist remains legally responsible for their work. As in Sweden Oral Hygienists are also authorized to work independently of dentists in the private sector. They may charge the patient directly.

 

         France

France today is one of the most modern countries in the world and is a leader among European nations. In recent years, its reconciliation and cooperation with Germany have proved central to the economic integration of Europe, including the introduction of a common exchange currency, the Euro. France is in the midst of transition from a well-to-do modern economy that has featured extensive government ownership and intervention to one that relies more on market mechanisms. France's leaders remain committed to a capitalism in which they maintain social equity by means of laws, tax policies, and social spending that reduce income disparity and the impact of free markets on public health and welfare. With at least 75 million foreign tourists per year, France is the most visited country in the world and maintains the third largest income in the world from tourism.

Standards of health care in France is rated as amongst the highest globally, but France is also renowned for being ultra-conservative about human resource development in the Oral Health sphere. Very rigid control and enforced authoritarian regulation of all aspects of practice in the health professions is reported. There were 42 000 dental surgeons on the register in 2002, of whom almost 70% were men. There are 1 800 dental surgeons specializing in orthodontics (the only dental specialist category recognized). In France no auxiliaries are allowed to work in the mouth. The only recognized auxiliary personnel are dental assistants, receptionists and dental technicians.

Most dental surgeons use independent dental laboratories and there are 5 500 industrial laboratories employing about 14 000 salaried workers. About 5 illegal denturists/clinical dental technicians are prosecuted every year. In France, because of the nature of its severe prohibition, the denturist movement has been entirely underground and is fearful of the power of the dentists and the legal system.

The biennial meeting of the IFD were scheduled to take place in the Palais de Congres in Cannes in 1989. The French Dental Association manipulated the Mayor of Cannes to cancel the booking on very short notice and the meeting were held in Mandelieu instead. Vast sums of money was made available by the Dental Association to resist any infringement on the monopoly of it's members.

Legal counsel for a previous French Association was threatened with disbarment should she continue to work for Denturists. A school for Denturism has recently opened in France, but on insistence of the Dental Association, the Minister of Justice has threatened to have it closed. The French Denturist Association has recently renewed its contact with the IFD and is looking to IFD for support in bringing education, examination and finally recognition to French Denturists.   

         Germany

As Europe's largest economy and second most populous nation, Germany is a key member of the continent's economic, political, and defense organizations. European power struggles immersed Germany in two devastating World Wars in the first half of the 20th century and left the country occupied by the victorious Allied Powers in 1949: divided into the the western Federal Republic of Germany and the eastern German Democratic Republic. The decline of the USSR and the end of the Cold War allowed for German unification in 1990. Since then, Germany has expended considerable funds to bring Eastern productivity and wages up to Western standards. Among the most important reasons for Germany's high unemployment during the past decade were macroeconomic stagnation, flat domestic consumption, structural rigidities in the labor market, lack of competition in the service sector, and high interest rates. The modernization and integration of the eastern German economy continues to be a costly long-term process, with annual transfers from west to east amounting to roughly $80 billion.

There is a long established insurance-based healthcare system of "sick funds ", which are not-for-profit organizations. Almost 90% of the population belongs to one of the 350 funds. There is also wide use of private insurance. Dental fees, both inside and outside sick funds and insurance based care, are regulated. There are over 64 000 dentists, all of whom must be members of the local Dental Chamber (x17) and the local self-governing regional dental authority (x22), and regulated by the National Federation of Dental Chambers. About 30% of all dentists belong to the Liberal Association of German Dentists. Four dental specialties are recognized and continuing education for dentists is mandatory.

There are 3 grades of specializations of Dental Chairside Assistants, of whom there were about 140 000 in 2002. Germany also has 250 Hygienists and a total of 65 000 Dental Technicians, who don’t have to register. In order to operate a commercial dental laboratory the dental technician owner must be registered by the Master Dental Technician’s Guild. Since the licensing of graduates from dental colleges was abolished in 1952, no new denturists  have been trained and dentists have ever since had a monopoly on the public supply of dentures.

The founder members of the IFD in 1956 was a German dental technician from Gelsenkirchen, Stephen Grabert, together with Hannes Stiebler (Vienna, Austria ) and Rolf Pfenninger (Zurich, Switzerland ). The movement was originally called the "Internationale Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Zahnprotetiker " (IAZ)

In a unified Germany with a total population of 82 million, the freedom of movement of workers as members of the EU, will likely result in the reintroduction of denturism that is currently operating underground.

 

        Greece                                            

Geographically, Greece is a very rural and mountainous country, but the population of 10.7 million is urbanizing rapidly, with over 4 million people (nearly half the population ) living in the capital, Athens. Greece has a capitalist economy. Tourism provides 15% of GDP. Immigrants make up nearly one-fifth of the work force, mainly in agricultural and unskilled jobs. Greece is a major beneficiary of EU aid. The Greek economy grew by nearly 4.0% per year between 2003 and 2006, due partly to infrastructure spending related to the 2004 Athens Olympic Games, and in part to an increased availability of credit, which has sustained record levels of consumer spending. The Greek Government continues to grapple with cutting government spending, reducing the size of the public sector, and reforming the labor and pension systems, in the face of often vocal opposition from the country's powerful labor unions and the general public.

General healthcare in Greece is provided by a complex mixture of private practitioners, social security organizations and, since 1983, of a basic state-funded national health services. Oral healthcare, besides preventive services offered free by NHS clinics to all children, is almost entirely provided by private practitioners, with patients paying the total cost of care. Indeed, one third of total private healthcare expenditure is on oral health, and about 80% of dentists are in private practice. In 2003 there were 12,800 dentists registered in Greece, of whom 46% were female. There are only two recognized specialties (Orthodontics and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery) but there are many other specialists in private practice.

The only auxiliaries are dental technicians and a limited number of chairside assistants. There are currently 160 dental assistants - the majority of dentists work without assistants. There are no hygienists or therapists in Greece. All dentists must belong to the Hellenic Dental Association (HDA). Continuing education is not mandatory, and is organized by the HDA and the dental societies in various fields and specializations.

In 2003 there were approximately 5,000 dental technicians. They are allowed to work independently by establishing a private laboratory - working under the strict prescription of the dentist, and they are not mandated or trained to do intra-oral work. However, and in spite of the strict restrictions on this, there are many Dental Technicians that respond to the public needs to supply dentures directly. These Illegal denturists  are small in numbers and it is not known whether there is a movement towards obtaining clinical training or recognized status.

 

        Hungary

Hungary was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, which collapsed during World War I. The country fell under Communist rule following World War II. In 1956, a revolt and an announced withdrawal from the Warsaw Pact were met with a massive military intervention by Moscow. In 1968, Hungary began liberalizing its economy, introducing so-called "Goulash Communism." Hungary held its first multiparty elections in 1990 and initiated a free market economy. Hungary has made the transition from a centrally planned to a market economy, and continues to demonstrate strong economic growth and acceded to the EU in May 2004. The private sector accounts for over 80% of GDP. Inflation has declined from 14% in 1998 to 3.7% in 2006. Unemployment has persisted above 6%.   

Out of the 10 million population of Hungary, only 140 000 people have a private health insurance, so they have little significance in the dental health care system. About 30% of dentists work wholly privately, outside the State system. Patients pay their dentist directly, under an item of treatment system. There is no regulation of private fees. The quantity of work done may come under the scrutiny of the Internal Revenue Service. Of the 70% who work in the State system, some will also work privately, part-time. For dentists who are contracted to work with the NHI the only private items that can be provided are those that are not covered by the insurance scheme. For those dentists who are in private practice, their patients are personally responsible for the fees charged.

Hungary has 5 000 dentists in active practice. There are no unemployed dentists. The most popular of 4 specialties is Pediatric Dentistry. There are 4 000 salaried dental assistants and 525 Hygienists who are usually paid a set fee for every patient they treat.

Hungary has an estimated 2 200 Dental Technicians. Laboratories are registered. Only technicians who have passed a “masters ” examination are registered. They normally work in commercial laboratories. They construct prostheses for insertion by dentists and they invoice the dentist for the work that is done. Many dental technicians do clinical work and have better experience than dentists in prosthetics.

Training in Denturism ceased in Hungary after 1956 but Denturists in Hungary have 30-35 years practical experience. It is those avant-garde Denturists  who can re-introduce the profession to Hungary again. The Society of Hungarian Denturists has a dedicated number of members who meet regularly. Their main concern is accreditation of the clinical examination and finding a way to get recognition for the diploma in Hungary.

 

        Ireland (Eire)

Irish governments have sought the peaceful unification of Ireland and have cooperated with Britain against terrorist groups. A peace settlement for Northern Ireland is being implemented with some difficulties. Ireland is a small, modern, trade-dependent economy with growth averaging 6% over the last decade. Agriculture, once the most important sector, is now dwarfed by industry and services. Over the past decade, the Irish Government has implemented a series of national economic programs designed to curb price and wage inflation, reduce government spending, increase labor force skills, and promote foreign investment.

The majority of dentists and hygienists practice privately.  All PCDs must be supervised by a dentist, and the situation regarding dental technicians has not changed despite an enquiry by Restrictive Practices Commission (now the Irish Competition Authority ). The Commission recommended that the relevant section of the Irish Dentists Act be amended so as to provide that the general prohibition on the carrying on of dentistry by a non-dentist does not apply to the provision to a person of eighteen years of age or over provided it does not involve work being done on living tissue.  The Commission also emphasized that the practice of denturism should not continue to be prohibited by law. These recommendations were never implemented, apparently due to resistance from the Irish Dental Council. 

The lack of official status for those working in this area of dentistry has been debated extensively since the 1970s. The Restrictive Practices Commission, a predecessor of the Competition Authority, held an official public enquiry into the issue in 1982 and published a Report highlighting the negative implications for consumers.[1] Over twenty years have passed since the publication of the Restrictive Practices Commissions’ Report, yet dental technicians still operate in an uncertain legal environment. There is still no official recognition for auxiliary dental professionals who would be qualified to sell dentures directly to the public (i.e. clinical dental technicians ), to do so legally [2]. Despite the Dental Council’s reservations about the necessity for a Clinical Dental Technician grade, it has submitted a proposal for the establishment of such a grade, following a request from the Minister [3]. Under the proposed Scheme, clinical dental technicians would be permitted to supply and fit dentures to members of the public. This scheme were rejected by the Minister primarily because it did not include a mechanism (or "grandfather clause" )[4] for recognizing the experience of dental technicians who currently work in the industry and who, in many cases, already sell dentures directly to the public (illegally)[5]. 

However, the Irish Association for Denture Prosthesis continue to petition the Competition Authority, Dental Council and Department of Health for the legalization of denturism.  In 2005 the Irish Competition Authority Report into the professional services of Dentists did in depth investigations into the results of restrictive practices in dental services.  The Report concluded by making explicit direct recommendations for the immediate implementation of a class of Clinical Dental Technician to provide this service in competition to dentists, as it will inevitably increase the competence of the service and decrease the price to the dental consumer[6]. It is not understood how the Irish Dental Council have managed to resist the direct prompting from the Minister of Health to implement Denturism for so long! It is reported that Ireland will soon have similar legislation to the UK. 

 

       Italy

Italy has a diversified industrial economy with roughly the same total and per capita output as France and the UK. This capitalistic economy remains divided into a developed industrial north, dominated by private companies, and a less-developed, welfare-dependent, agricultural south, with 20% unemployment. Most raw materials needed by industry and more than 75% of energy requirements are imported. The current government has enacted numerous short-term reforms aimed at improving competitiveness and long-term growth. Italy has moved slowly, however, on implementing needed structural reforms, such as lightening the high tax burden and overhauling Italy's rigid labor market and over-generous pension system, because of opposition from labor unions. Unemployment remains at a high level.

There are thought to be up to 44 000 dentists who work in private practice, but this includes many medical physicians and general practitioners who have some dental equipment in their office. They are self-employed and charge fees almost exclusively as ‘items of service’, the levels of which are controlled by market forces.

Italy has 2 000 Hygienists, 60 000 Chairside Assistants and about 7 000 Dental technicians. Hygienists can only work under the prescription of a dentist who must be present in the same practice at all times. Their duties (defined by Decree in 1999 ) include oral hygiene instruction, scaling and dietary advice. Hygienists are unable to administer local anesthesia.

Dental Technicians are not legally authorized to work at the chairside, or treat patients, and are only legally allowed to manufacture prostheses from a dentist’s prescription. There is also a considerable amount of illegal practice in Italy, some of which is condoned by medical practitioners, who cover for the technicians concerned. Many Denturists practice under the supervision of dentists. Their movement towards legislated Denturism is limited.  

 

         Kenya

Kenya is located on the east coast of Sub-Saharan Africa on the Equator and incorporates an area of some 13, 000 square kilometers of lakes including Lake Victoria, it hosts the magnificent snow-topped Mount Kenya (Africa's second highest peak), the Rift Valley and part of the Serengeti Plain. The Kenyan Highlands comprise one of the most successful agricultural production regions in Africa; a unique physical geography supports abundant and varied wildlife of scientific and economic value. Kenya's climate varies from tropical along the coast to arid in the interior and has been hampered by recurring drought and flooding during the rainy seasons.

The regional hub for trade and finance in East Africa, makes Kenya powerful in the region but is poor by world standards. The country has suffered from faltering economic performance over the past decade. The population of Kenya is 33.5 million with a growth rate of 2.5% one of the fastest in the developing world. 50% of the population is younger than 15 years old.

In December 2002 the National Rainbow Party Coalition came to power in peaceful elections. While Kenya is regarded as politically stable, most of it's neighbors are currently or have until recently been - fighting civil or external wars. This has led to an influx of arms and refugees to Kenya, particularly from Somalia and Sudan. Since the elections, the new government has made some progress, including the introduction of primary education and the enactment of anti-corruption legislation. However, there is still a critical need to invest in the country’s health and economy.

The Kenyan Government’s Ministry of Health is the biggest provider of health care services. Fifty percent of hospitals are government funded as are 80% of community health centres and 61% of dispensaries. Non-government organizations are a vital part of the Kenyan health system, providing funding for some hospitals, dispensaries and community health centres. Although there are subsidies to state hospitals and clinics, individuals are personally responsible for payment for all dental services. The large majority of inadequate numbers of dentists in Kenya are working in larger affluent urban areas such as Nairobi and Mombasa, with very few deployed in the rural areas. There are no chairside assistants, but dental health officers (therapist/hygienist  category ) are employed by the state to provide basic services including simple fillings, extractions and oral hygiene education, etc. 

Kenya has 180 Dental Technologists, who are "officially " not qualified to do intra-oral work. About 100 are in private practice, making dentures and some crown & bridgework, on contract for dentists in the urban areas. Another ±80 are salaried to work for the State in hospitals and clinics, especially in the rural areas. These rural clinics are often operated without dentists. Even when dentists are available, much of their time is engaged with administration work in state hospitals. Their clinical efforts are focused almost exclusively on oral health procedures, i.e. fillings, root canal treatments, extractions and surgical procedures and they do not have the time (or the specialized skills ) for the clinical procedures of supplying removable appliances. These dentists do very little denture work and direct such denture needs to dental technologists working in the clinics, who are better equipped to provide the service directly. 

The Kenyan Dental Technology Association is interested in the recognition of these "denturists ", and is seeking an avenue to attain accredited clinical training for dental technologists doing this work. Dental technicians with practical experience in this field working in Nigeria and some other North-African countries are also reported to be interested in upgrading their qualifications to become approved Denturists. 

 

        Malta

Malta lies at the heart of the Mediterranean, situated south of Sicily and north of North Africa. The country comprises an archipelago, with only the three largest islands being inhabited; numerous bays provide good harbors. Malta has narrow meandering streets, towns and villages that are crowded with Renaissance cathedrals and Baroque palaces and the oldest known human structures in the world. With superbly sunny weather, expansive beaches, a thriving nightlife and intriguing history, there is a great deal to see and do. The economy is dependent on foreign trade, manufacturing (especially electronics and pharmaceuticals), and tourism. Malta and Tunisia are discussing the commercial exploitation of the continental shelf between their countries, particularly for oil exploration.

This Mediterranean Island has a population of 400 000. Private practice provides the bulk of all dental treatment and patients pay directly for most of the dental treatment. Private medical insurance only covers certain procedures, such as surgical procedures. Private fees are fully "free market  " by nature and they are determined by agreements between dentists and their patients. Continuing education for the 140 dentists of Malta is not mandatory. 16 Dental hygienists work under the prescribed instructions of a dentist, in a clinic or private practice. Their work includes scaling and normal dental hygiene, and oral health instruction.

In the late 19th century, tradesman from Sicily arrived in Malta to practice as Dentists or Denturists to make teeth. When dental education was introduced, some of these trade’s people became trained in dentistry and became dentists. Others continued their practice of fabricating dentures and became known as Dental Mechanics. Without formal education, Dental Mechanics became dependent on the monopoly of dentists. Eventually, realizing the hard work in providing dentures, dentists gave the practice over to Dental Mechanics to do the laboratory work. Some Dental Mechanics continued to provide dentures direct to the public and a rivalry between the two professions began. Dentists referred to them as "quack dentists " making dentures that "caused cancer ". Independent Dental Mechanics or Denturists were blacklisted by dentistry and only those who remained under dentistry’s control were given contract laboratory work. 

However, Denturists continued to practice their profession and in fact there were no prosecutions, because although Denturism is not recognized specifically by law in Malta, it is not regarded as illegal. The MDTA have developed a Code of Ethics, which was officially launched on the website of the Department of Health, together with those of all the other paramedical professions, and a Mission Statement. Denturists provide full and partial dentures. They also provide immediate dentures  with the cooperation of a small group of dentists. In 1985, a school of Dental Technology was established and in 1986 registration began for Dental Technicians who became recognized as a paramedical profession and subsequently became known as Dental Technologists. All 20 dental technicians of Malta are members of The Malta Dental Technician Association (MDTA),  of which 5 are officially known as Denturists. The Association is looking to develop the 4-year diploma course in dental technology into a degree level. In collaboration with the European Dental Laboratory Owners (FEPPD), the Malta Association has established an educational sub–committee to help in the standardization of education and training for both the laboratory Dental Technician and the Denturist. In this matter of standardization of Education and Training in the EU, Denturism is well ahead as there seems to be better understanding of the development and evolution of this specialization. The MDTA is hopeful that with the advent of legislation in the UK in 2006, the Maltese government will be more willing to have more intense and fruitful discussion on the formal legislation of Denturists in Malta.  

The 2008 AGM of the International Federation of Denturists will be held at the Fortina Hotel in Sliema on the Mediterranean island of Malta. Sliema is a fashionable resort with modern amenities and a rocky beach. The peninsula stretches out into the Mediterranean looking out to Valletta and has a promenade, which is ideal for early morning jogs or early evening walks. 

 

        Mauritius

Situated just South of the Equator in the crystal clear waters of the Indian Ocean, Mauritius was officially discovered in 1505 by the Portuguese and has since gone on to attract a variety of occupants, including British, French and Dutch natives along with the introduction of African, Arab and Chinese influences over the decades. Summarized in simple terms as a ‘Tropical Oasis ’, Mauritius is at first sight a sanctuary of peace and tranquility, combining lush forests with inspiring greenery and dazzling beaches. However deep at the heart of this divine island, lies a vibrant and exciting multi-cultural community. Its enviable mix of culture is what adds to the intrigue of the island, and visitors are welcomed with sincere warmth and hospitality.  

Since independence in 1968, Mauritius has developed from a low-income, agriculturally based economy to a middle-income diversified economy with growing industrial, financial, and tourist sectors. For most of the period, annual growth has been in the order of 5% to 6%. This remarkable achievement has been reflected in more equitable income distribution, increased life expectancy, lowered infant mortality, and a much-improved infrastructure. Sugarcane is grown on about 90% of the cultivated land area and accounts for 25% of export earnings. A stable democracy with regular free elections and a positive human rights record, the country has attracted considerable foreign investment and has earned one of Africa's highest per capita incomes. Recent poor weather and declining sugar prices have slowed economic growth, leading to some protests over standards of living in the Creole community

The relative paucity of dentists provides services to only a small group of wealthy upper class. The Dental Act recognizes Certified Dental Mechanics, who are legally permitted to provide full & partial dentures  directly to the public[7]. There are no further data available about the details of numbers in practice or whether health insurance is a factor in the distribution of health services on Mauritius. 

 

        Netherlands 

A modern, industrialized nation, the Netherlands is also a large exporter of agricultural products. The country was a founding member of NATO and the EEC (now the EU).  The Netherlands has a prosperous and open economy, which depends heavily on foreign trade. The economy is noted for stable industrial relations, moderate unemployment and inflation, a sizable current account surplus, and an important role as a European transportation hub. The country continues to be one of the leading European nations for attracting foreign direct investment. 

Health care is provided by a government-regulated system of health insurance. There are schemes which an individual may belong to, public schemes (sick funds), or private for higher earners. The public scheme is compulsory for those under 65 on low incomes. In 2003 there were 7,623 active registered dentists under 65 years of age of whom 23% were female.  Whilst the use of specialists is limited to orthodontics and maxillo-facial surgery, there is a broad use of dental auxiliaries. Continuing education is not mandatory. All dentists practice privately, however, 90 % of dentists are also contracted to a public dental scheme. The national healthcare scheme is financed by both employers and employees, and is for those in the low-income bracket. Approximately 63 % of the populations are insured under this, while those who can afford it subscribe to private health insurance to supplement the cost of treatment. In the Netherlands maximum fees for private dentistry are set nationally, and regulated by the government. The Health Care Professions Act introduced in 1997 impacted upon dentistry in that it made registration compulsory, revised the disciplinary code and introduced formal quality assurance procedures. 

Hygienists are permitted to work independently of dentists and charge their patients, although the majority still work within the dentists’ practices and charge the patient via the dentist (since all work they carry out must be referred by them. ) They are, therefore, accountable for the work they carry out. There is a case study on the liberalization of hygienists in the Netherlands.

Since the passing of the 1989 Denturism Act by the Dutch Parliament in The Hague, Denturists can fit full dentures  if the patient is edentulous, but partial dentures  can only be made in co-operation with a dentist. Dutch consumers have voiced their irritation about the unrealistic restrictions on denturists' scope of practice. Denturists are also authorized to take money directly from the public

In 2006, the Dutch health care system has undergone the severest change in the last 60 years. All Dutch citizens are now obligated to join in the collective health care insurance.  This system insures that all dentures and dentures on implants are insured in this basic health care policy.  An internet application helps the Denturist to screen patients on insurance.  This data is collected in a central database.  The Denturist is also able to send declarations digitally to the insurance companies and payment is directly sent to the Denturist. 

Good partnership in so-called dental teams (dentist, dental hygienist, Denturist ) is becoming common in the Netherlands. 

 

        New Zealand

Over the past 20 years the government has transformed New Zealand from an economy dependent on concessionary British market access to a more industrialized, free market economy that can compete globally. This dynamic growth has boosted real incomes (but left behind many at the bottom of the ladder), broadened and deepened the technological capabilities of the industrial sector, and contained inflationary pressures. Per capita income has risen for the past 8 consecutive years. The Labor Government promises that expenditures on health, education, and pensions will increase proportionately to output.

Dentistry in New Zealand is almost entirely privately funded. There is some limited state-funded dentistry for children up to the age of 18 years, and through hospital dental departments. There is no set fee scale in New Zealand, as the Commerce Act outlaws collusion or any similar behavior that may restrict competition. The transfer of records at the patients’ request is commonplace.

The Office of the Health and Disability Commissioner deals with complaints regarding dentists. If they feel it is necessary, the complaint can be passed to the Director of Proceedings for prosecution, before the Complaints Review Tribunal or the Dentist Disciplinary Tribunal. The former can fine dentists, while the latter may strike them off the register, suspend or restrict their practicing. The trade body, the New Zealand Dental Association, also has a complaints officer in each regional branch.

The proposed Health Practitioners Competency Bill will mean that dental therapists will not have to be overseen by a dentist. If it comes into force, therapists will be registered and they will also be permitted to work in the private sector. At present, hygienists are required to work under the direct supervision of a dentist, who must be on the premises. Hygienists will be registered under the Health Practitioners Competency Bill, and their trade body is petitioning for them to be allowed to work under the supervision of a dentist who is not on the premises. 

Clinical dental technicians providing full & partial dentures  can work directly to the public since 1988. The first CDTs were registered through a grandfather provision after proof of competence was established for illegal practitioners. CDTs are now trained alongside dental students and are tutored by both Prosthodontists and Clinical Dental Technicians in Dunedin at New Zealand's National School of Dentistry at the University of Otago. CDTs may provide mobile services, which is popular amongst denture wearers in retirement complexes, homecare and rural areas. The New Zealand Institute of Dental Technologists (NZIDT) regulates both dental technicians and CDTs. As in Australia and the Netherlands there is a trend for Dentists, CDTs and Hygienists to combine their services in group practices. 

 

        Norway

In 1996 the dental fee system in Norway changed from one where fees were determined largely through negotiation with the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, to an entirely private system with fees being determined by market forces. Dental care is still free for those under 18 years of age, while 19 to 20 year olds pay 25 per cent of the charges. There are no subsidies to reimburse the cost of private care. Under the Dental Price Information Act, dentists are required to provide patients with comprehensive price information and to advertise their range of treatments widely. Dentists are expected to record the diagnosis and discussion of treatment options in the patient’s records. If the cost of the treatment exceeds a given amount, then the patient should be given a written estimate.

Hygienists have been allowed to practice independently of a dentist and charge the public directly for their services since the beginning of 2001. They are legally accountable for their work, unless a dentist has delegated it. However, unlike the other Scandinavian countries of Sweden and Finland, denturism remains illegal in Norway.

Most dentists practice in the public sector in Sweden. The public dental service offers free care for children up to 19 years and only care deemed appropriate and necessary to adults. The latter is financed by state dental insurance, and by fees paid by patients. Charges are regulated by the government, and are comparable in both the public and private sectors. The costs of all types of treatments in the public dental service are reimbursed, as long as they are necessary to patients’ oral health. Complex and costly courses of treatment are refunded on the condition that an expert has approved them prior to treatment.  

 

          Poland  

Poland is an ancient nation that was conceived near the middle of the 10th century. Its golden age occurred in the 16th century. In a series of agreements between 1772 and 1795, Russia, Prussia, and Austria partitioned Poland amongst themselves. Poland regained its independence in 1918 only to be overrun by Germany and the Soviet Union in World War II. It became a Soviet satellite state following the war, but its government was comparatively tolerant and progressive.  A "shock therapy" program during the early 1990s enabled the country to transform its economy into one of the most robust in Central Europe, but Poland still faces the lingering challenges of high unemployment, underdeveloped and dilapidated infrastructure, and a poor rural underclass. The new leaders of the Solidarity Trade Union pledged to reduce the Trade Union's political role. With its transformation to a democratic, market-oriented country largely completed, Poland is an increasingly active member of Euro-Atlantic organizations.

Poland has a system of healthcare financed by means of a common health insurance within the National Health Fund. Availability of dental care is limited due to the Fund’s insufficient financial means and very low budgetary expenditure on dentistry. Private care is freely available, however. Private fees are fully free market in nature. They are determined in agreements between dentists and their patients. Attempts have been made at founding private insurance systems.

24 100 of all dentists are actively working (72% female ). 5 000 registered dentists were over 65 years old.  Specialists are widely used, but the clinical auxiliaries are limited to hygienists. Continuing education for dentists is mandatory, and is administered by the Polish Chamber of Physicians and Regional Chambers, to which all dentists must belong.

There are 2 500 hygienists in Poland. Their duties include preparation, registration, prophylactic care and promotion of health. They may not diagnose or give local anesthesia and are not allowed to work without the presence of a dentist. They may not accept fees from patients, except on behalf of the dentist. There are 9 700 dental nurses. They are assistants, with training by the dentist. There is no formal education available for dental nurses. Besides assisting the dentist they are not permitted to undertake other duties.

Poland has about 7 000 dental technicians. The training for Dental Technicians is conducted at Medical Schools and Universities (Technical Colleges ), and lasts 2 years. Dental technician is a professional title conferred upon the completion of the training, when a diploma is granted. They register with their own association to conduct commercial activity. Technicians normally work in commercial laboratories, only a few are employees of dentists or of clinics. They may work in clinics on salaried contract or by tender for fees. Dental Technicians do not have a strong association so there is a lack of credible representation in dealing with government. This situation dates from the communist era when dentists and dental technicians worked for the state but could also work privately for themselves. It was a unique situation in all communist countries. During the communist era they could not organize an association. After the collapse of communist system, dental technicians worked freely, establishing private dental laboratories.

A proposition regarding implementation of Denturism has been presented to the Ministry of Health. Rejection of the application would allow a push for favorable legislation by means of self-education, assisted by the IFD. The Denturist Association have renewed contacts with colleagues who are interested in practicing Denturism legally.  

 

        Portugal    

Following its heyday as a world power during the 15th and 16th centuries, Portugal lost much of its wealth and status with the destruction of Lisbon in a 1755 earthquake, occupation during the Napoleonic Wars, and independence from Brazil as a colony in 1822. A 1910 revolution deposed the monarchy; for most of the next six decades, repressive governments ran the country. In 1974, a left-wing military coup installed broad democratic reforms. The following year, Portugal granted independence to all of its African colonies.

The Health Service employs doctors, nurses and other supporting staff, but only a very small number of stomatologists and until recently no dentists. The publicly funded oral health care system in Portugal is complex and not very comprehensive. Dentists may contract to one or more Sick Fund schemes. Each scheme has its own list of eligible treatments and scale of fees and most include emergency care. Few provide cover for advanced prosthodontics. In 2003 there were 4,500 dentists registered in Portugal. Specialists are new to Portugal and there were only 41 (37 orthodontists and 4 oral surgeons).

Portugal has 600 dental technicians who have various degrees from six universities. There are another 2 000 bench-trained dental technicians who qualify through a union sponsored exam. Although there is a Paramedical Act, there is no current legislation for Denturists, but larger laboratories do denture work directly for patients. One university is interested in a Denturist syllabus and is ready to propose this to the Ministries of Health and Education. Portugal is also looking to the IFD for assistance in developing this course.

 

        Romania

After decades of dictatorship, Romania began the transition from Communism in 1989 with a largely obsolete industrial base and a pattern of output unsuited to the country's needs. There is strong domestic activity in construction and agriculture, and a need for creating a middle class and address Romania's widespread poverty, while corruption and red tape continue to handicap the business environment. Romania joined the European Union in 2007, and the IMF has praised the country's recent reform efforts in preparation for EU.

Almost 90% of Romanian dentists are private; they have fiscal code and all kinds of legal authorizations for free practice, with full responsibilities. 42% of Romanian dentists are owners of their dental offices. 48% of dentists are not owners, but work in old buildings offered temporarily, free of rent, by the Government, which is the real owner. The dentists who work within social health insurance are paid partially (40%) by the CSHIH (through banks) and partially directly by the patients (60%). Patients pay the dentists, who work in private sector, directly and completely. The financial position of the patient also determines the choice of possibilities. It is estimated that patients directly pay at least 90% of the costs of dental treatments.

In Romania, there are 8 700 dentists (2002) – 66% being female. More then 40% of dentists are older than 50 years. In some parts of Romania, it is reported that some dentists use old types of dental treatment and prosthetic restorations, due to the level of dental education of different generations of dentists. Romania also has 5 000 General Stomatologists. There are officially no clinical dental auxiliaries in Romania. There are approximately 7 200 Dental Assistants (Nurses) and additionally, 3 000 Dental Technicians. Both categories have to be registered with the Order of Romanian Medical Assistants.

Dental assistants train in secondary medical schools, with 3 years of study and a final examination and diploma. The duties of dental assistants are: assisting dentists, maintaining records, sterilization, infection control, and office work. Dental assistants are paid a salary.

Dental technicians are trained in dental technician colleges, organized in frame of the dental faculties. The training is for 3 years, with a final examination and a diploma. Dental technicians normally work in separate dental laboratories and invoice the dentist (or directly the patient) for completed prosthetic works. A small number of technicians are employees of dental practices and they are paid with a percentage of the fees for the prosthetics work.

In the absence of clinical training for dental technicians, there is some illegal supply of dentures practiced by technicians, without appropriate further qualifications. This practice of illegal denturism is being suppressed and prosecuted, but does not prevent the public denture wearers from seeking out these direct providers.  

 

        Slovakia

The dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian Empire at the close of World War I allowed the Slovaks to join the closely related Czechs to form Czechoslovakia. Following the chaos of World War II, Czechoslovakia became a Communist nation within Soviet-ruled Eastern Europe. Soviet influence collapsed in 1989 and Czechoslovakia once more became free. The Slovaks and the Czechs agreed to separate peacefully in 1993. Slovakia has mastered much of the difficult transition from a centrally planned economy to a modern market economy and made excellent progress in macroeconomic stabilization and structural reform. Major privatizations are nearly complete, and the government has helped facilitate a foreign investment boom with business friendly policies such as labor market liberalization and a 19% flat tax. Unemployment remains the economy's Achilles heel. Slovakia joined the EU in 2004.

61% of dentists in Slovakia are female. About 73% of private dentists have an agreement with an insurance company. These dentists work mostly in former public institutions, where they rent the premises, and sometimes also the dental equipment. They are paid from the health insurance according to their output, paid fully or partly by the insurance company (depending upon the patient’s co-payment). 

The Slovak Denturist Association meets every third Saturday to participate in continuing education seminars. Membership is growing and a second group of practitioners undertook the clinical exam in March 2004 after the initial 15 successful candidates. Eight candidates successfully completed the Exam facilitated by an IFD examination panel. Another 65 candidates are waiting to take the examination.

The Slovak Denturist Bill in an advanced stage during 2004, was held back by more pressing priorities such as joining the EU. Having hosted the IFD AGM in Bratislava in 2005 convinced the Slovak Minister of Health of the benefits of the Denturist profession for the public. Despite huge opposition from dentists, The Minister introduced the Denturists Bill to the legislature. With only another 24 hours needed to pass the Bill, the government collapsed and an early election was called. The denturist political supporters are now in the opposition. In view of the general popularity and the benefits of denturism to the public, the new government is likely to introduce the profession soon.

 

      South Africa

South Africa is a middle-income, emerging market with an abundant supply of natural resources; well-developed financial, legal, communications, energy, and transport sectors; a stock exchange that ranks among the 10 largest in the world; and a modern infrastructure supporting an efficient distribution of goods to major urban centres throughout the region. However, growth has not been strong enough to lower South Africa's high unemployment rate, and daunting economic problems remain from the Dutch and British Colonial era followed by the apartheid policy (separate development for different races) of the previous Government - especially poverty and lack of economic empowerment among the disadvantaged groups. South African economic policy is fiscally conservative but pragmatic focusing on targeting inflation and liberalizing trade as means to increase job growth and household income.

This website is about introducing the category of denturist to the oral health needs in South Africa. White women of South Africa, older than 65, who has had access to the best dental services in the country, have an unacceptably high level of edentulousness, almost twice as high as the males of the same group, due to their dutiful regular visits to the dentist. The creation of financial incentives in the private sector have detracted from the ultimate goal of health for all, and instead have created freedom for practitioners to abuse and mismanage the patient’s health and medical schemes. Access to basic oral health services has been woefully inadequate and unaffordable to the majority of the population. Unilateral decision-making and health care planning by dentists and the Department of Health have previously deliberately excluded the denturism lobby.

By law only a dentist is allowed to measure, fit and sell dentures to members of the public. There are dental technicians in South Africa who specialize in the manufacture and repair of dentures, many of whom serve the public directly, practicing Denturism illegally "on the side ". However, despite having made provision for Clinical Dental Technology through enabling legislation in 1997, they are unable to acquire appropriate clinical training in South Africa or to register as clinical dental technologists. The poorer segment of the edentulous population, who are not able to afford private dental fees are making use of illegal, untrained, unqualified denture services by quacks, and are subjected to unhygienic procedures and cross infection of communicable diseases. The state does not provide a safe alternative route of supply to the indigent population.

The creation of a register of clinical dental technicians, who will be allowed to sell dentures direct to the public, will provide competition to dentists in the sale of dentures. Buyers of dentures will have more choice for at least the same, or a better quality service then currently exists, provided by qualified professionals and thereby displace the current illegal and unsafe supply of dentures by quacks. The provision of dentures by denturists will free the hands of dentists to use their time and specialized skills more effectively towards the prevention and treatment of oral disease and the promotion of oral health.

With this website at <www.denturism.co.za> The Society aim to become more effective in sharing facts about denturism especially to the public.  A debate involving the public is now possible without the interference of a go-between! This Website intends to inform relevant stakeholders of our motivations, professional services, products and up to date information as it becomes available.

  

      Spain 

Spain's powerful world empire of the 16th and 17th centuries ultimately yielded command of the seas to England.  Spain remained neutral in both World Wars, but suffered through a devastating civil war during the 1930’s. A peaceful transition to democracy following the death of dictator Franco in 1975, and rapid economic modernization have given Spain one of the most dynamic economies in Europe and made it a global champion of freedom. Continuing challenges include Basque Fatherland and Liberty (ETA) terrorism and relatively high unemployment.  

Despite the economy's relative solid footing significant downside risks remain including Spain's continued loss of competitiveness, the potential for a housing market collapse, the country's changing demographic profile, and a decline in EU structural funds.

In 2002 there were 19,678 registered dentists in Spain (±14 000 actively working ), of whom 41% were female. Approximately 98% of the profession work in the private sector and are largely in single-handed practice. Most are self-employed and earn their living through charging fees for treatments. Generally such private practitioners accept only private fee-paying patients. There is no prescribed fee scale and the laws controlling free competition restrict the possibility of set fees, but regional dental associations provide recommended fees for different treatments. 

The Dental Act of 1986 recognizes Hygienists and Dental Assistants but do not recognize Denturists. There are 9 000 Hygienists and 20 000 Dental Assistants. Hygienists are allowed to carry out prophylaxis and oral health education, but only under the prescription of a dentist who must be present in the building while they are working. Spain has almost 10 000 dental technicians but dentists dominate the provision of dentures. The IFD had contact from Spain to assist in the denturism aspirations of dental technicians seeking to get legalized recognition.  

 

         St Kitts (St Christopher ) and Nevis

Saint Kitts and Nevis achieved independence from Britain in 1983. In 1998, a vote in Nevis on a referendum to separate from Saint Kitts fell short of the two-thirds majority needed. With coastlines in the shape of a baseball bat and ball, the two volcanic islands are separated by a three-km-wide channel called The Narrows; on the southern tip of long, baseball bat-shaped Saint Kitts lies the Great Salt Pond; Nevis Peak sits in the centre of its almost circular namesake island and its ball shape complements that of its sister island. 

Sugar was the traditional mainstay of the Saint Kitts economy until the 1970s. The government closed the sugar industry following the 2005 harvest after decades of losses at the state-run sugar company. To compensate, the government has embarked on a program to diversify the agricultural sector and to stimulate other sectors of the economy. Activities such as tourism, export-oriented manufacturing, and offshore banking have assumed larger roles in the economy. Tourism revenues are now the chief source of the islands' foreign exchange; Additional tourist facilities, including a second cruise ship pier, hotels, and golf courses are under construction.

The Caribbean Islands had been represented in the past at the IFD, when Jamaica were members for an extended period, and have hosted the biennial Congress of the Federation on this Caribbean Island during the early 1990's. The vast area of scattered islands, is not only famous for calypso & reggae music and for being a popular tourist destination, but also hosts denturism ambitions. Two individual members from St Kitts and Nevis have recently joined the IFD, and hopes to advance their cause for legal status as direct denture providers. 

 

       Switzerland

Switzerland's sovereignty and neutrality have long been honoured by the major European powers, and the country was not involved in either of the two World Wars. The political and economic integration of Europe over the past half-century, as well as Switzerland's role in many UN and international organizations, has strengthened Switzerland's ties with its neighbors. Switzerland remains active in many UN and international organizations but retains a strong commitment to neutrality. Switzerland is a peaceful, prosperous, and stable modern market economy with low unemployment, and a highly skilled labor force. The Swiss in recent years have brought their economic practices largely into conformity with the EU's to enhance their international competitiveness. Switzerland remains a safe haven for investors, because it has maintained a degree of bank secrecy and has kept up the franc's long-term external value. Unemployment has remained at less than half the EU average.

In Switzerland, apart from a small number of dentists employed by hospitals or the school dental service, most oral healthcare is provided by independent private practitioners and paid for directly by individual patients. About 10% of the population are members of private insurance schemes, which cover some dental care costs, especially orthodontics. 89% of dentists are in private practice of which 50% is in single-dentist practices. Numerous dentists do not like to work in the field of full and partial prosthetics. This is due to a lack of experience and due to Universities offering only superficial training in the field of prosthetics. Some dental technicians work illegally; but they would be willing to accept training to become a Denturist if such training was available.  

Since 1961 Denturists are permitted to work in private practice, but only in the cantons of Zurich, Nidwalden, Schwyz and Appenzell-Innerrhoden. They are allowed to provide all removable prostheses  independently. Their services are not covered by the health insurance. They train under postgraduate modules for dental technicians offered only to residents (of >5 years) of Zurich and this requires an additional training period of 1 500 hours. Denturists have to register with the cantonal health department. The Swiss Society have very recently rejoined membership to the IFD and plans to restructure their training system in terms of international trends, and are aiming to have the whole of Switzerland legally accessible to Denturists.

 

          United Kingdom of Great Britain                           

The jurisdiction of the UK includes England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland as well as the Channel Islands of Guernsey & Jersey and the Isle of Man. The UK National Health Service (NHS) is largely funded through general taxation and providing healthcare to all. Approximately 80% of NHS funds are from general taxation, with the balance coming from charges to patients for prescriptions, dental and optical care. About 40% of all primary dental care is paid from the state system and the balance is through patients’ co-payments and fully private practice.  Specialists are widely used and the use of clinical auxiliaries is well developed. Participation in continuing education is mandatory for all registered dentists, whether in clinical practice or not. 

In 2003 a Health Act was passed by Parliament, enabling changes to the system of delivery of NHS healthcare at the “primary” level, from April 2005. The Act will alter the relationship of primary care practitioners to more locally negotiated contracts, and new payment systems. The majority of details of these changes were not available for inclusion on this website. There will also be changes to the system of co-payments by patients. Despite the fact that the workforce is slowly growing, there is a severe shortage of dental workforce in the UK. Apart from some 32 000 dentists in the UK, there are also 45 000 dental auxiliaries known as Professionals Complementary to Dentistry (PCDs), classed as:

In the UK, Dental Technicians admitted to the Dentists’ register under the 1921 Dentists Act proved to be successful dental practitioners, particularly in dental prosthetics, by virtue of their training as technicians [8]. The Nuffield Foundation concluded in 1980 that dental auxiliaries would play a much bigger part in delivering future dental and oral health care. In 1993 the Foundation did another in depth investigation into the education and training of Dental Personnel and a demand and need for a class of denturist was identified[9]. The 2003 Office of Fair Trading Report into private Dentistry in the UK did an in-depth investigation into the results of restrictive practices of denture provision. In conclusion the valued contribution of Denturist practice were acknowledged by the Report[10], and specific recommendations made for the introduction of a category of Clinical Dental Technician, in order to improve efficiency and cost to the patient[11]. 

Legislation for Clinical dental technicians were passed in the UK in 2005, to provide all removable dental appliances. They will be referred to as registered Dental Care Professionals and will be allowed to sell dentures directly to the public and work in their own practices independently of dentists and will be allowed to employ any other member of the Oral Health Team. The General Dental Council has established a new Register of Clinical Dental Technicians as well as a Register of Dental Technicians. As yet there are no Clinical Dental Technology training programs in the UK but the General Dental Council is currently working with training providers to develop such courses. As an interim measure, The George Brown College in Toronto, Canada qualification is now being accredited by the Royal College of Surgeons of England and has become a recognized diploma for registration in the UK. Patients will not be required to visit a dentist in the first instance. Clinical dental technicians will only need to refer patients to a dentist if they themselves are not competent to carry out a particular procedure or if a condition is present that is beyond their scope of practice.

 

         United States of America

The US has the largest and most technologically powerful economy in the world. In this market-oriented economy, private individuals and business firms make most of the decisions. US firms are at or near the forefront in technological advances, especially in computers and in medical, aerospace, and military equipment; their advantage has narrowed since the end of World War II. Long-term problems include inadequate investment in economic infrastructure, rapidly rising medical and pension costs of an aging population, sizable trade and budget deficits, and stagnation of family income in the lower economic groups.

The dental market in the United States is mainly private, with a small percentage of public funded dentistry. Prices for private treatment are not set by a particular body, as this could constitute price fixing, which is against state and federal law. Dental records are frequently transferred between dentists at the request of a patient. Patients who are unhappy with their treatment can complain to the complaints officer of the dental or denturist regulatory board. In some states, dentists and PCDs are registered and regulated by the same board, in other states they are separate. Denturists receive extensive formal training, and  work independently of dentists and charge directly for their services

In 1980 the ADA advocated the development of inexpensive techniques (the Triad-system) to reduce the cost of services as a method of reducing the impact of Denturists in the provision of services at much lower cost. Dental clinics were opened in Oregon, Maine  and Arizona  and operated by Dentists to provide a low cost denture service in competition with privately practicing Denturists[12]. These clinics were financially supported and subsidized by the ADA, but this did not, however, end the popularity of Denturists and these clinics have since closed and the counter-offensive failed[13]. In the States of Idaho (1982), Montana (1984) and Washington (1994) the profession of Denturism have since been legislated bringing the USA total to six and in a number of other states of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Wyoming, etc  major battles have been going on for some time, some more intense than in others. This appears to be a turf war determined by vast sums the ADA are prepared to spend on lobbying/defending dentists rights, and the general public are the losers, being denied from having any choice in getting dentures from alternative providers. 

Throughout the US, many dentists are discontinuing to offer denture services, dental schools have cut back their curriculum hours in denture training for dental students by 90% over the past thirty years and over the next ten years, one-third of all dentists who currently provide denture care are expected to retire from practice, leaving the US denture population in a vacuum[14]. With denturism being legalized in all Canadian states up north, and with at least 25 State Associations active, it appears that denturism ambitions is distributed fairly general throughout the USA. In most states the practice is forced underground. Clientele is build solely by word-of-mouth referral from previous customers to their friends and their relatives. Sizable illicit practices have been built in this manner. Another common practice is for denturists to guarantee their work to the satisfaction of their customers, to provide as many adjustments as necessary for such satisfaction without additional charge, and to make refunds where satisfaction is not received. This practice is obviously good public relations which is likely to be particularly important for businesses built on referrals from previous customers. It is a competitive tool with respect to dentists who virtually uniformly do not offer refunds to dissatisfied customers and are in some states forbidden by law from guaranteeing their work[15]. 

The US Federal Trade Commission   sent all state governments a letter of recommended rule-making; encouraging them to institute the profession of denturism in their state, after conducting a five year study. In most legalized states denturists are not restricted in the services that they can provide (i.e. full and partial dentures) and are permitted to own denturist and dental practices.  As the President of the National Denturist Federation USA stated: "Denturists are trained stand-alone practitioners who are in direct competition with dentistry for that market which is referred to as Removable Oral Prosthetics."

 

The Dental Liaison Committee in the EU (MANUAL OF DENTAL PRACTICE 2004)  reported that despite the absence of a legislated mandate or clinical training for dental technicians to provide dentures directly to patients, there is evidence of it happening illegally, due to a consistent demand from the public to be served directly by the skilled manufacturer of their dentures, in a number of European countries, notably: Cyprus, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, etc. This may be due to a de-emphasis in dentists training in prosthetics and frustration of denture wearers having to work through an expensive go-between that prevents their needs and preferences to be communicated to the manufacturer. 


This overview were compiled from data published in: 

  • The Office of Fair Trading Report into Private Dentistry in the UK (2003),
  • The Dental Liaison Committee in the EU (MANUAL OF DENTAL PRACTICE 2004)
  • The Competition Authority Report in professional services of Dentists in Ireland. (2005 )
  • Country Reports by the International Federation of Denturists (2002-2006)
  • The World Factbook 2007 compiled by The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) 

[1] Report of Enquiry into the Statutory Restrictions on the Provision of Dental Prostheses, Restrictive Practices Commission, 1982
[2] The reader should be aware of the distinction between “dental technician”, “clinical dental technician” and “denturist” – see Differentiating denture providers. The terms “clinical dental technician” and “denturist” can be used interchangeably
[3] FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION REPORT. - American Denturist Advocacy Council – a Public Information Website: www.usdenturist.com/Facts/Federal Trade Commission report
[4] A “grandfather clause” is a provision exempting persons or other entities already engaged in an activity from rules or legislation affecting this activity
[5] In 2004, Mr Martin Kenny, a dental technician, took an unsuccessful case to the High Court against the Minister for Health and Children for refusing to approve this scheme. The case is now under appeal. Cf Kenny v The Dental Council High Court (Gilligan J), 27 February 2004
[6] THE COMPETITION AUTHORITY REPORT: Competition in professional services – Dentists/ Executive Summary. Dublin, Ireland. December 2005 www.tca.ie
 
[7] Barbara Himmel DENTURISTS - BIRTH OF A PROFESSION Published by the Denturist Society of Alberta, Canada, 1989
[8] The Teviot Report (1946) INTER-DEPARTMENTAL COMMITTEE ON DENTISTRY HMSO  Appendix by Major JP Helliwell 
[9] The Nuffield Foundation - EDUCATION AND TRAINING OF PERSONNEL AUXILIARY TO DENTISTRY, 1993 London UK 
[10] The Office of Fair Trading argued: “We believe that professionally trained staff should not be stopped from supplying services directly to the consumer that they are able to provide. This relaxation should expand the supply of dentistry services and offer greater choice both to consumers and to those working in the profession.”
[11] Office of Fair Trading: REPORT INTO PRIVATE DENTISTRY IN THE UK – 2003 www.oft.gov.uk/ market+investigations/ investigations/ dentistry 

[12] DENTURISM – A NEW PROFESSION. A Report by the SA Federation of Dental Technicians 1990 Authors: C du Plessis & DF Malherbe
[13] MacEntree MI. The Denturist movement in Canada. Part II: ACCEPTANCE IN EASTERN CANADA. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association, Vol 8. – 1981
[14]
E Van den Eeden (2007) "Denturists – The Solution to America’s Denture Crisis". Michigan Denture Reform Committee.
[15] www.usDENTURIST.com/Federal Trade Report

 

Solidarity for Denturism   

All around the world there is a passion amongst dental technicians aspiring to denturism and recognized denturists, to support one-another, and a general solidarity to strengthen the profession, to encourage others to excel and achieve their educational goals & legal status and to enhance the profession. This tangible support and camaraderie is internationally based and extended to all that has an interest in Denturism. In this regard the International Federation of Denturists (IFD) have proved over many decades that this goodwill transcends over all global boundaries. South Africa have recently been welcomed into the membership of the IFD through The Society for Clinical Dental Technology.

Membership of the International Federation (IFD) consists of national Denturist organizations from around the world interested in providing a forum for the promotion of the profession. The gradual spreading of the profession is proof of the strength and efficiency of the IFD and the cooperation extended from one national Association to another in spite of the daunting opposition presented by the monopoly holder. Denturists have a committed tenacity to meet the challenge and have the successful examples of international colleagues as inspirational motivation. Denturism looks toward building the international support, which will assist in meeting the professional and inter-professional challenges of the twenty-first-century. Denturists work toward redefining relationships with other dental health care professions, and addressing issues like legislated monopolies and will continue to carve out their role and responsibilities in terms of DENTURISM. 

Denturists from all nationalities are committed to continuous education and meet often to share insight into interesting cases, learn from each other's experience, and gain insight into the latest developments in technology and the profession. These interactions take place whether the profession has legal status or not, to be on top of the cutting edge of technology and build out their practices for their denture patients' advantage.

Shortly after posting this website on 7 May 2007, visitors from further a field made a courtesy call to The Society. At this occasion were from left to right: Mr Oliver Meier (registered CDT from New Zealand ), Mr Hutsi Kgothule (from the Cape Peninsula University of Technology ) and in the middle, Mr Petri Malherbe (IT Support of The Society ). Second from the right is Mr Paul Muli, a prospective denturist from Kenya on a study tour, enquiring about clinical training through distance education for students from Africa, and on the right is the Secretary of The Society, Mr Duffy Malherbe.

 

 

At the dawn of 2008, one of our appreciated international co-workers visited The Society to personally bring his good wishes from Australia for our campaign to establish Denturism in South Africa. Ismail Larney (grew up in Cape Town) is in the process of retirement as Dental Studies Teacher from the Sydney Institute of Technology. Ismail is in  part- time, private practice and is further also involved in various Humanitarian programs,  working towards the advancement of education for the destitute in South Africa.

 

 

The movers & shakers of Denturism - Sterkenburg Castle, 2003               International delegates at the 2003 AGM of the IFD in Utrecht

 

 

The European Committee Meeting if the IFD in Aarhus, Denmark - 2004        Delegates intermingle at the 2004 AGM of the IFD in Montreal, Canada 

 

Expanded services - Removing Market Restrictions:

According to a Personnel Survey by the FDI [1], in 90 countries worldwide, a total population of 4 billion, are served by:

  • 750 000 Dentists

  • 600 000 Dental Assistants

  • 215 000 Dental Technicians

  • 150 000 Oral Hygienists

  •     6 500  Denturists

  •     6 400  Dental Therapists

The World Health Organization's Division of Non communicable Diseases/Oral Health reported that 60% of the world's population of age 65-74 were edentulous[2]. Studies in South Africa have shown that 74% of the non-institutionalized Coloreds older than 55 are edentulous. The institutionalized White population older than 65 was recorded to be 88% edentulous. It is further of significance that we have a rapidly ageing population in South Africa, with the retired group estimated to already exceed 18% of the total population. 

Although preventable, dental caries and periodontal disease are two of the main conditions that eventually leads to tooth loss. In many parts of the world, the efforts in the war against tooth decay is still distracted by side-issues related to professional boundaries and income levels. In view of the technological advances made in oral health materials, equipment & procedures and the vast variety of disciplines involved in modern dentistry, any consideration of Oral Health Human Resources is best  assessed as a team of experts, all specialized in their own field or calling, but working jointly to the benefit of the consumer.

Professionals Complementary to Dentistry 

In some Commonwealth Countries dental care providers other than dentists, are sometimes collectively referred to as Professionals Complementary to Dentistry (PCDs)[3] and include dental technicians, oral hygienists, dental therapists, and dental assistants. The vital roles of PCDs have all too often been under-recognized and their career development neglected due to restricted access to specialized education. There are a variety of PCDs who would be in a position to provide certain services in competition with dentists, but who can currently only be accessed by consumers through dentists. This limits the freedom of PCDs to offer services to the public, and restricts competition and choices in the market[4]. The way that dental services are provided, subject to a dentist's invoice, should be liberalized, obviously subject to the maintenance of proper safeguards on service quality. Lifting regulatory restrictions on some of the professions that may practice the "business of dentistry " would allow the public to be served in new and more innovative ways[5]. There should be an awareness of the limited knowledge and training that each category has in specific disciplines, and where appropriate, recognition should be given to those categories that can expand their training and scope of practice to better serve the oral care needs of individuals and their communities. 

Payment for clinical services of PCDs  

Both Oral Hygienists and Dental Therapists are trained clinicians and although they are specialized, their training overlaps to a large extent. Oral hygienists undertake some procedures and work also undertaken by dentists. However, at present, Professionals Complementary to Dentistry (PCDs) cannot charge consumers directly for their services, or claim from Third Party Health Funders and be compensated on the same bases as dentists are for similar corresponding procedures[6]. As gatekeepers, dentists essentially determine which of their own and which of the PCDs’ services are offered to patients. Consideration should be given to allow Oral hygienists to practice independently and claim from third Party Health Funders if they so desire. Oral hygienists and dental therapists' services could be utilized better by expanding their deployment into independent private practice with a focus on preventive dentistry and oral hygiene education. 

The cost of training a dental therapist is half of that of a dentist. The cost of employing a dental therapist is half of that of a dentist and claimed to form a strategic fit with the provision of a basic package of dental care service in the public sector. The workload in the public sector involves primarily the delivery of the basic minimum package of dental care as prescribed by the Minister of Health. Dental Therapists are also allowed to practice independently in the private sector and claim from third Party Health Funders. However many of these schemes are managed and dominated by dentists and manipulated in such a way that the procedures carried out by dental therapists are compensated differently and effectively discriminates against their services[7]. Anticompetitive fund allocation by medical schemes, and exclusion from consultation and representation in the dental programs and structures makes it impossible for Medical Scheme members to be treated by the category of his/her choice in a fair and rational way[8].  

Predicament of dental technicians

In the case of dental technicians, the law limits them to design and construct dental appliances and they are neither permitted to undertake the fitting of these appliances nor to charge patients directly or claim from third party Health Funders[9]. It is reported that some dental technicians often only gets payed after 90 days (or up to 150 days) by some clients (Some dentists simply withhold payment of their laboratory account for a month when they go on holiday), and have to pay dentists tens of thousands of Rands every month to entice them to get payed for the services they had provided previously[10]. This type of fraud and extortion is reported to run into millions of Rands annually[11]. The statutory health authorities are committed to try and clean up this type of abuse and mismanagement. 

Some dental technicians are defying the law that prescribes the fragmentation of the denture delivery procedures through a go-between, out of compassion for the denture wearers plight, and provides removable dentures directly to insisting consumers in direct competition with dentists. Although no fees are generally charged for the clinical procedures, it is reported that despite such patients not being able to claim from their Medical Schemes for any of these services, they are often prepared to pay in cash out of their own pockets for making the dentures, because of the high standard of service and level of denture satisfaction they get from direct delivery of dentures[12]. When denturism is introduced, denture wearers utilizing the service should be allowed to claim from third Party Health Funders in an equitable fashion. As is reported in Ireland[13] and the UK[14], substantial hidden savings are already being made by the unauthorized supply of dentures by dental technicians. In the USA[15] and the EU[16] there is also evidence that dental technicians can perform useful work for consumers, since, ‘In many member states, "Denturists " work unofficially or illegally and fit patients with dentures'[17] especially since their qualifications are not recognized or access to clinical training denied.

Oral Health services provided by privately practicing Dentists is generally restricted to their urbanized dental surgeries and in many communities is increasingly becoming exclusively an elitist service to the wealthy and Medical Scheme members. Once normalized, Denturism is the denture service of choice for the wealthy as well as the poor, as it is the end result that proves the success in function and aesthetics. Therefore it is only fair to allow the patient to make the choice. Denturism is as effective in Industrialized nations as they are in Third World countries and so versatile and accessible that they serve the whole range of denture wearers whether they find themselves in affluent urban communities, peri-urban slums or in way-out rural communities. Denturists providing Mobile Denture Services have shown to be a most effective way to serve and access sparsely populated rural communities and are often the only denture service available for geriatric patients.

A partially or fully edentulous patient in need of rehabilitation have a variety of options in terms of treatment plans, at  a variety of costs and service providers. Top of the speciality fields would include a prosthodontist providing a fixed or removable bridge possibly supported by implants at a very exclusive fee. Those that can not afford such treatment could consider another option, possibly including a removable denture incorporating a metal frame through a dentist. Even more affordable would be a removable acrylic or thermoplastic denture through a Denturist. The public should not be prevented from having this additional option to choose from! Many patients can not afford any other option, and can testify to the functional and aesthetic success of Denturists' services.

Restrictions on the sale of dentures and clinical training

In South Africa, organized Dentistry has consistently opposed the establishment of clinical training for Dental Technicians to upgrade to Denturists, but have suggested that the irresponsible "Backdoor-quack " providers could be legitimized or that oral hygienists and dental therapists could be trained to make and provide dentures to address the backlog in denture services. In Australia and Canada Dental Therapists/Oral Hygienists becoming Denturists were given no exemptions for any subjects and vice versa, simply because there are no corresponding overlap in course content of these speciality courses. The Dental Therapist would need to have the full three years training to be taught prosthetics because they have no grounding in either dental technology or oral prosthetics including clinical prosthetics. The course contents of these disciplines is completely divergent[18]

PCDs often get frustrated by feeling overtrained for what they do, and restricted from what they could do, because of training restrictions. There is ample room for integration with career laddering, equity, recognition of prior learning and structural and functional alignment of the Oral Health  Professions. The scopes of practice should be reviewed taking into account career pathing, articulation and flexibility in order to eliminate the negative impact of terminal professional Qualifications, with no hope for progressing further[19]. When considering what changes in the law might be appropriate in South Africa to allow PCDs to compete openly in a unrestricted market and allow more efficient utilization of Human Resources, it is useful to consider what has happened in other countries. In consideration of new workforce models in an effort to improve oral health care access and availability and to increase the productive capacity of the overall dental workforce, allied dental professionals can complement, supplement, or substitute for the dentist as part of an efficient and productive oral health care team.

International research shows that in some countries certain PCDs are allowed to perform certain procedures independently and allowed to charge their consumers directly and also claim directly from Medical Schemes. In Denmark oral hygienists have a screening role in some public dental clinics and are authorized to work independently of a dentist and charge for their services in the private sector[20]. Finland and Sweden have also legalized the independent practice of hygienists in the private sector[21].  Currently, dental therapists and oral hygienists in South Africa can practice certain clinical aspects of dentistry but dental technicians are not allowed to. In their wisdom Parliament has conceded to introduce a category of Clinical Dental Technology[22]. The definition introduced to the Dental Technicians Amendment Act proposed that this category be registered by the HPCSA regulated by the Health Professions Act. This Act does not yet recognize the category of Clinical Dental Technologist and consequently does not provide for their training or registration either. Therefore, dental technicians are unable to acquire appropriate clinical training in South Africa as the category of clinical dental technologist does not yet exist in practical terms in South Africa. As a consequence, the sale of dentures directly to the public is not permitted by anyone other than a dentist and the contravention of this provision is liable for criminal prosecution! See also Restraint on selling dentures and the solution for an analyses of the market-effects and the solution to abolish the restraints. 

Established Denturism

In various countries (Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Malta, Mauritius, Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland, UK, USA, etc), Denturists are permitted to work independently of dentists and to charge their patients directly[23]. In fact Denturism is so effective, Dental Schools in Australia are considering to discontinue denture training for dental students. They are also finding it hard to find dentists who can teach prosthetics to their undergraduate programs. The type of work denturists are permitted to perform, varies from one country to another, but generally includes (/strives to include) all removable prosthetic appliances. The Society for Clinical Dental Technicians believe that the suggested changes in the law to implement Denturism, will expand the supply of dentistry services and the customary mindset about the ways of delivering these services[24]. It will offer greater choice both to consumers and to those working in the profession, and should enhance competition. It will further empower the "dentally disabled  " to a fair choice of options to rehabilitate their functional (eating ), verbal (speaking ), aesthetical (appearance ) and emotional (confidence ) health and well being. Where denturism has been established, cooperation between dentists and denturists was common. Oral healthcare professionals who referred their patients to the other profession also benefited by receiving more patients on referral from them and thereby serves the public oral health needs more comprehensively as a team.

Denturists should be viewed as working under prescription of dentists, which means that they still retain the control of the oral health outcomes of the patients. The provision of dentures by CDTs will free the hands of dentists to use their time and specialized skills more effectively towards the prevention and treatment of oral disease and the promotion of oral health. Where Denturism has been implemented globally they are offering a support structure, and not a direct competition structure as in a conflicting sense, although it has the effect to put downward pressure on prices. It simply means that there is another health professional group in the mix, similar to doctors referring patients to pharmacists, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and psychologists, that all provide support structures to doctors to treat medially related patients. Dentists make use of hygienists, dental therapists and other dental specialists. Why not a clinical dental technologist as well, for removable prosthetics?

Removable prosthetics is concerned with the replacement of teeth and their supporting structures by patient-removable devices. Dental prostheses have to conform to strict biological, physical and mechanical principles if they are to restore lost functions effectively[25]. Each patient presents individual problems that require a multi-disciplinary approach to understanding the problem and devising a solution, the provision of which needs highly developed manipulative skills.  Oral Health Professionals serving these patients must be competent to design and manufacture removable prostheses to a clinically acceptable standard. Advanced forms of prostheses can involve occlusal rehabilitation, sophisticated metal technology, precision attachments and implants. Denturists receive more intense training in prosthetics than dental students and see a much higher amount of denture patients on a daily basis than dentists. The continued fragmentation of this service through a go-between with the given communication impediments, can often not produce the same level of specialized prosthetic service provided by denturists.

Oral hygienists and dental therapists are equipped with some clinical and patient skills, but have no knowledge about the principles of balanced occlusion or any of the technical aspects involved in the three-dimensional design and manufacture of removable prosthetics. They have no knowledge of the clinical procedures or the manufacturing intricacies of removable prosthetics and will have to be trained from scratch in this discipline, if prosthetics is to be included in their domain. In contrast, Dental technicians are experts in making dentures and could be allowed access to clinical training and be allowed to use their skills to provide dentures directly, as Denturists[26] at a very low additional training cost.  It would be more logical to implement a category of Denturist for this function, and the most cost-effective training-option of expanded function. Dental technicians are already proficient in the construction of removable prosthetics and have the necessary manual dexterity and procedural perception that is essential for the successful application of the clinical procedures. The two clinical subjects that qualifies dentists to supply dentures, are taught in about 11 academic weeks [27]. Instead of duplicating the current inadequate training that dental students receive in removable prosthetics, South African dental technicians would rather subscribe to the International Baseline competencies prescribed by the IFD for Denturists to provide a sound clinical grounding. Without doubt, the creation of a category of Denturist (CDT) will be the most cost-effective and rational Human Resource Development in removable prosthetics.

Furthermore  :

In many countries it is now reportedly becoming increasingly common to find Dentists, Denturists, Oral Hygienists, Dental Therapists and other OH professionals complementing each other’s services in group practices.  Denturists providing Mobile Denture Services have proved in many countries to be the most effective way to serve and access sparsely populated rural communities and are often the only denture service available for geriatric patients. In Finland it was reported that dentists were more than adequately compensated for loss of denture work by referrals from denturists for other oral health procedures. In Canada, typically 15% of denture cases have been referred by dentists. Indeed, in many countries where denturism have been established, it is becoming common practice for Dentists to sub-contract their denture cases with complications, "difficult " patients and psychosomatic patients to the "Specialized Denture Service " of Denturists!

In South Africa provision has been made for the establishment of a category of Clinical Dental Technologist in the Dental Technicians Amendment Act of 1997. In 1998 The Society For Clinical Dental Technology was inaugurated and the motivational report: "Clinical Dental Technology: A Quest for Equity in Oral Health Care " was submitted to the SADTC, the National Department of Health and the Minister of Health. Despite continued attempts by The Society to stimulate a debate with the stakeholders, no provision has yet been made for the clinical training to qualify them, or for their registration. Oral Health Human Resource Development workshops organized by dentists in the Department of Health have deliberately excluded the denturism-lobby from participation.

The public needs more efficient and cost-effective services that are in line with international practice and Free Market principles. Human Resource Development have been suppressed much too long in South Africa in Oral Health Care. The question the denture wearers of South Africa needs answered is why are we not following the international trend, moving forward together, in a spirit of mutual respect, to champion the only real cause worth tackling, that of the oral health and well being of our communities? That goal can best be achieved by all categories doing their very best in their own expert capacities and by removing outdated and unjustified restrictions and monopolies! 

In the final analyses the consumer must have the freedom of choice to make informed decisions by him/herself without interference of monopolistic manipulation of the market! They must be empowered to get access to better affordable rehabilitation.

See also Restraint on selling dentures and the solution and Policy Recommendations


[1] PERSONNEL SURVEY BY THE FÉDÉRATION DENTAIRE INTERNATIONALE (1990) reported by the Nuffield Foundation in 1993
[2]
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, Division of Non Communicable Diseases/Oral Health, WHO Collaborating Centre, Malmo University, Sweden, 1999, p.1.
[3]
OFFICE OF FAIR TRADING REPORT into private Dentistry in the UK 2003  
[4]
The Competition Authority Report: COMPETITION IN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES – DENTISTS/ Executive Summary. Dublin, Ireland. December 2005 www.tca.ie
[5]
National Consumer Council: BARING IT’S TEETH? AN AUDIT OF THE GENERAL DENTAL COUNCIL’S REFORMS - National Consumer Council. London, 2002
[6]
The Nuffield Foundation - EDUCATION AND TRAINING OF PERSONNEL AUXILIARY TO DENTISTRY, 1993 London UK
[7]
DENIS THE MENACE 09 Aug 2006 Naidoo LS. www.dentasa.zoomshare.com/News/2.shtml
[8]
GROSS INJUSTICE AND PROFESSIONAL DISCRIMINATION –The Dental Therapy Association. Naidoo LS www.dentasa.zoomshare.com/News/2.shtml
[9]
CLINICAL DENTAL TECHNOLOGY: A QUEST FOR EQUITY IN ORAL HEALTH CARE by The Society for Clinical Dental Technology, 1998. Motivational Report to the SADTC, Minister of Health and the Department of Health. Authors: Malherbe DF, Steyn LA, Du Plessis C, Fatagodien Z <
[10]
DENTISTS ALLEGEDLY INVOLVED IN DODGY DEALS 22/08/2006 www.dentasa.org.za/documents/news.html See also www.dentaltechforum@yahoogroups.com for 22/o8/2007
[11]
TECHNICIANS WITH INFO TO COME FORWARD 22/08/2006 www.dentasa.org.za/documents/news.html
[12]
Consumers and dental technicians serving the public directly, in consistent reporting to The Society.
[13]
The Competition Authority Report: COMPETITION IN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES – DENTISTS/ Executive Summary. Dublin, Ireland. December 2005 www.tca.ie
[14]
OFFICE OF FAIR TRADING REPORT into private Dentistry in the UK 2003
[15]
A STUDY OF DENTURITRY - Directed by the 1998 General Assembly, Kentucky. Legislative Research Commission, January 2000. Robert Sherman, Michael Greer, Ann Mayo Peck. Research Report No 292
[16]
EUROPEAN UNION RECOGNITION OF PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS www.International-denturists.org/Country Reports 2004
[17]
The Nuffield Foundation - EDUCATION AND TRAINING OF PERSONNEL AUXILIARY TO DENTISTRY, 1993 London UK
[18] Correspondence from Graham Key, Chairperson of the IFD Education Committee and Head of Dental Prosthetist training at Randwick College of TAFE, Sydney (member of the National Advisory Committee on Oral Health (NACOH) in Australia) on 13 APRIL 2007

[19]
Minutes of a meeting between the Health Professions Council of south Africa (HPCSA) and the National Department of Health, 13 March 2007
[20] MANUAL OF DENTAL PRACTICE 2004 © The Liaison Committee of the Dental Associations of the European Union May 2004
[21]
The Competition Authority Report: COMPETITION IN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES – DENTISTS/ Executive Summary. Dublin, Ireland. December 2005 www.tca.ie
[22]
Dental Technicians Amendment Act (Act 43 of 1997) – Definitions
[23]
CLINICAL DENTAL TECHNOLOGY: A QUEST FOR EQUITY IN ORAL HEALTH CARE by The Society for Clinical Dental Technology, 1998. Motivational Report to the SADTC, Minister of Health and the Department of Health. Authors: Malherbe DF, Steyn LA, Du Plessis C, Fatagodien Z
[24]
Memorandum by The Society for Clinical Dental Technology to the Human Resources Cluster of the National Department of Health as a GENERAL MOTIVATION FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CATEGORY OF CLINICAL DENTAL TECHNOLOGIST IN ORAL HEALTH CARE. – In response to the Draft Strategic Framework for Human Resources for Health Plan. August 2005
[25]
Memorandum by The Society for Clinical Dental Technology to the Human Resources Cluster of the National Department of Health as a GENERAL MOTIVATION FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CATEGORY OF CLINICAL DENTAL TECHNOLOGIST IN ORAL HEALTH CARE. – In response to the Draft Strategic Framework for Human Resources for Health Plan. August 2005
[26]
PROVISION OF REMOVABLE PROSTHETICS BY DENTURISTS – WHAT IS THE CONTROVERSY? International Dentistry South Africa. Duffy Malherbe Vol 8 No 1. Jan 2006
[27]
Correspondence from The Society to the Minister of Health dated 28 November 2005, in response to a letter from Dr Neil Campbell CEO of the SADA to the Minister  on 11/10/2005, with regards to provisions of the Dental Technicians Act and Clinical Dental Technology.

 

Navigation Buttons

     

      

Last Update 28/10/2007    http://www.denturism.co.za    Site Design and IT Support by: No_N!ck